• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Conservation >What does community participation in nature protection mean? The case of tropical national parks in Africa
【24h】

What does community participation in nature protection mean? The case of tropical national parks in Africa

机译：社区参与自然保护意味着什么？非洲热带国家公园的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In spite of significant investment, community-based conservation often suffers from a lack of appropriate design. In this study, drawing on 86 interviews around six national parks in tropical Africa, we analyse the perceptions of different stakeholders (e.g. governmental officials, non-governmental organization staff and researchers) regarding community participation. Our results mainly reveal the absence of a clear and shared definition of community participation. While 67% of the participants defined community participation as a community's support of nature protection (low empowerment) and/or as its participation in conservation implementation (medium empowerment), 28% mentioned that the community should also participate in decision-making (high empowerment). Our study shows that participants with no university degree, belonging to governmental organizations and/or employed as workers tend to propose a lower level of empowerment, while those educated to a postgraduate level, belonging to research institutes and/or employed as researchers propose higher degrees of empowerment. Our study mainly suggests that the different degrees of empowerment proposed by the stakeholders depend on their relation to the space of conservation and their daily connection to practical management as drivers of the inclusion or exclusion of local communities in conservation decision-making. To properly design and implement community-based conservation, conservation actors above all must share a common definition of the concept.
机译：尽管投入了大量资金，但基于社区的保护往往缺乏适当的设计。在这项研究中，我们在热带非洲六个国家公园周围进行了86次采访，我们分析了不同利益相关者（例如政府官员，非政府组织工作人员和研究人员）对社区参与的看法。我们的结果主要表明，缺乏对社区参与的明确和共有的定义。虽然67％的参与者将社区参与定义为社区对自然保护的支持（低授权）和/或其参与保护实施（中等授权），但28％的参与者提到社区也应参与决策（高授权） ）。我们的研究表明，没有大学学位，属于政府组织和/或受雇为工人的参与者倾向于提出较低的授权水平，而受过高等教育，属于研究机构和/或受雇于研究者的研究生则倾向于较高的授权水平。授权。我们的研究主要表明，利益相关者提出的不同程度的授权取决于他们与保护空间的关系以及它们与实际管理的日常联系，这是在保护决策中纳入或排除本地社区的驱动力。为了正确地设计和实施基于社区的保护，最重要的是，保护参与者必须对此概念有一个共同的定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号