• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Conservation >Who gets to imagine transformative change? Participation and representation in biodiversity assessments
【24h】

Who gets to imagine transformative change? Participation and representation in biodiversity assessments

机译：谁能想象变革改变？生物多样性评估中的参与和代表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has been mandated to assess transformative change in order to identify pathways for achieving the 2050 Vision for Biodiversity. Yet, the topic of transformative change raises significant new challenges for biodiversity assessments because it combines scientifically plausible projections about the drivers and trends of biodiversity loss with normative and collective visions of a sustainable world for nature and people. In this commentary, we argue that assessments of visions of a sustainable world should also ask 'whose values and visions count?' because different values and visions influence which voices and perspectives are considered relevant for generating scientific knowledge for transformative change. In particular, we argue that this situation requires rethinking modes of participation and co-production in assessments of transformative change: from consulting different groups as potential 'users' of assessments to seeing how visions of a sustainable world are represented through the selection of evidence and actors. In other words, assessments need to be less concerned about the inclusion and exclusion of actors, and more concerned about how these actors bring the perspectives of others with them.
机译：政府间科学政策平台和生态系统服务（IPBES）被授权评估转型性变化，以确定实现2050年生物多样性愿景的途径。然而，转型变革的主题对生物多样性评估提出了重大的新挑战，因为它将科学合理的预测与生物多样性损失的司机和趋势相结合，以及对自然和人民可持续世界的规范性和集体愿景。在这方面，我们认为，可持续世界的愿景评估还应问“其价值观和愿景算？”因为不同的价值观和愿景的声音和视角被认为是对为改变变革产生科学知识的相关性而有关的。特别是，我们认为这种情况需要重新思考的参与模式和在转型变革的评估中的共同制作方式：从咨询不同的群体作为潜在的评估，了解可持续世界的愿景是如何通过选择证据而代表的愿景。演员。换句话说，评估需要不太关注纳入和排除行动者，更关注这些行动者如何与他们带来其他人的观点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Conservation》 |2020年第4期|220-223|共4页
  • 作者

    Silke Beck; Tim Forsyth;

  • 作者单位

    Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ Leipzig Germany;

    Department of International Development London School of Economics and Political Science London UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号