...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Education Research >The changing and complex entanglements of research and policy making in education: issues for environmental and sustainability education
【24h】

The changing and complex entanglements of research and policy making in education: issues for environmental and sustainability education

机译：教育研究与政策的变迁与复杂纠缠：环境与可持续发展教育问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper focuses on the complex, entangled relationships between research and policy and suggests this is a very important topic in the contemporary era of so-called, 'evidence-based' or 'research-based' policy in education. The paper argues that we can only ever have 'evidence-informed' and 'research-informed' policy because all policy is an admixture of facts (research), politics (discourses, values, ideologies) and professional knowledges, a position readily apparent in respect of ESE and broader climate policy. The paper also argues that post-truth contexts and the politics of affect provide a significant backdrop to research/policy relationships with specific salience in respect of environmental and sustainability education (ESE) research and policy, given the conflictual politics surrounding this domain. The distinction between research for and of policy is used analytically in the paper. While research for policy, often conducted by private consultancies, might have a more direct and immediate impact on policy, it is suggested that research of policy, often conducted by academic researchers, and indeed research of a critical kind, potentially can have long-term impact, affecting the assumptive worlds of policy makers, often in unacknowledged ways. Globalization has resulted in the global circulation of policy ideas and thus research can affect policy at varying levels in contemporary policy processes of the restructured/rescaled state. Some consideration is also given to the rise of big data and policy as numbers. The paper discusses implications of such developments for considerations of research/policy relationships, particularly in relation to ESE. The paper concludes by suggesting the current climate emergency demands activist research and researchers in the ESE domain and also activist teachers and students.
机译：本文重点介绍了研究和政策之间的复杂关系，并建议这是当代时代的众所谓，“基于证据”或“基于研究的教育政策”的一项非常重要的话题。论文认为，我们只能有“证据通知”和“研究知识的”政策，因为所有政策都是事实（研究），政治（Discourses，价值观，意识形态）和专业知识的掺合物，一个易于明显的位置尊重ESE和更广泛的气候政策。本文还辩称，鉴于该领域的冲突政治，对环境和可持续发展教育（ESE）研究和政策的特定突出的研究/政策关系提供了重要背景。在论文中分析使用研究和政策研究之间的区别。虽然私人咨询公司经常进行的政策研究可能会对政策进行更直接和立即影响，但建议对政策进行研究，通常由学术研究人员进行，并且实际上对批判性的研究，可能有长期的研究影响，影响政策制定者的假设世界，通常以未经认识的方式。全球化导致政策思想的全球流通，因此研究可以影响改组/重新纳入国家当代政策过程中不同水平的政策。一些考虑因素也是大数据和政策的兴起。本文讨论了这种发展对研究/政策关系的思考，特别是与ESE相关的影响。本文通过暗示当前的气候应急要求ESE域中的活动学家研究和研究人员以及活动家教师和学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号