...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental engineering and management journal >CO2 AND ENERGY FOOTPRINT OF DIFFERENT RETAINING WALLS SOLUTIONS. MASONRY RETAINING WALL vs. CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL
【24h】

CO2 AND ENERGY FOOTPRINT OF DIFFERENT RETAINING WALLS SOLUTIONS. MASONRY RETAINING WALL vs. CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL

机译:不同挡土墙解决方案的二氧化碳和能量足迹。砌体挡土墙与悬臂挡土墙

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper presents the most economical and less polluting retaining wall system, calculated for the same site, having few different common heights used in design. The paper will highlight the importance of an environmentally friendly solution, but also the most economical solution, which should be the main criteria in the design. Two of the tools used in environmental life cycle assessments (LCA) are the carbon footprint and the energy footprint. The quantification of the carbon and the energy footprint associated to the two types of retaining walls for three different heights is presented. The assessment procedure is performed for the construction stage. The retaining walls are designed, using European norms embedded in Geo 5 software, in similar ground conditions, similar loads and weather conditions. Considering the computed cross sections, the materials quantities and on site assembly are calculated and also the CO2 footprint, the energy footprint and cost. Few different constructive solutions were compared, and the outcome of the paper is the most economic retaining wall in terms of emissions of carbon dioxide, energy consumption, and not the least, the cost.
机译:本文提出了一种最经济,污染最小的挡土墙系统,该系统是针对同一地点计算的,几乎没有设计中使用的不同常见高度。本文将重点介绍环保解决方案的重要性,同时还要强调最经济的解决方案,这应该是设计的主要标准。环境生命周期评估(LCA)中使用的两个工具是碳足迹和能源足迹。给出了与三种不同高度的两种挡土墙相关的碳和能量足迹的量化。在施工阶段执行评估程序。挡土墙的设计使用嵌入在Geo 5软件中的欧洲规范,在相似的地面条件,相似的载荷和天气条件下进行。考虑到计算出的横截面,可以计算出材料数量和现场组装,还可以计算出二氧化碳足迹,能源足迹和成本。比较了几种不同的建设性解决方案,就二氧化碳的排放,能源消耗以及成本而言,本文的结果是最经济的挡土墙。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号