...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental impact assessment review >A historical review of the cumulative science in SEA effectiveness
【24h】

A historical review of the cumulative science in SEA effectiveness

机译：海洋效力累积科学的历史综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Based on research on the effectiveness of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and the critical factors determining it, numerous questions regarding SEA and its effectiveness have come to light. In this paper, we address a range of these questions based on a review of 39 peer-reviewed scientific articles. Questions are examined such as how effectiveness is defined and how the critical factors affecting it are determined. The concept of effectiveness is broadly accepted, but its meaning differs between different schools of thought. Effectiveness is clearly kept apart from the concept of quality, but in many definitions of SEA effectiveness, we have seen the concepts presented as overlapping and developing through time. At any point in time, a multitude of meanings of effectiveness thus exist, sustaining the idea of Thomas Kuhn that this kind of social science is not really cumulative. To overcome these limitations, we present a view of how these different concepts can be presented in a number of logical and historical steps. Based on the critical factors and their concentration into broader concepts, it targets to the formulation of a general, more comprehensive model that can describe the interrelationship between general- and stage-specific critical factors. It is concluded that "comprehensive models of causation" exist which condense a broader range of critical factors into only 4-10 main topics that describe the most pivotal forces at play. It may be possible to facilitate a common understanding of the nature of SEA and thus invite future research.
机译：基于对战略环境评估（海）有效性的研究和确定它的关键因素，有关海洋的许多问题及其有效性已经到来。在本文中，我们根据对39个同行评审科学文章的审查来解决一系列这些问题。检查问题，例如如何定义有效性以及如何确定影响它的关键因素。有效性的概念被广泛接受，但其意义与不同学校之间的意义不同。有效性显然是与质量概念之外的效果，但在海洋效率的许多定义中，我们已经看到概念呈现为重叠和发展时间。在任何时候，因此存在的有效性的多种含义，维持托马斯库恩的想法，这种社会科学并不是真正累积。为了克服这些限制，我们介绍了这些不同的概念如何以许多逻辑和历史步骤呈现。基于关键因素及其集中度进入更广泛的概念，它旨在制定一般，更全面的模型，可以描述一般和阶段特定的关键因素之间的相互关系。得出结论，存在“综合因果态度”，其凝聚着更广泛的关键因素，只有4-10个主要的主题描述了戏剧最重要的力量。有可能促进对海洋性质的共同理解，从而邀请未来的研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental impact assessment review》 |2020年第7期|106412.1-106412.7|共7页
  • 作者

    Zhang Jie; Kornov Lone; Christensen Per;

  • 作者单位

    Guangxi Univ Int Coll Daxuedonglu 100 Nanning 530004 Guangxi Peoples R China;

    Aalborg Univ Dept Dev & Planning Danish Ctr Environm Assessment DCEA Rendsburggade 14 DK-9000 Aalborg Denmark;

    Aalborg Univ Dept Dev & Planning Danish Ctr Environm Assessment DCEA Rendsburggade 14 DK-9000 Aalborg Denmark;

  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Review; SEA; Effectiveness; Critical factors; Context;

    机译：审查;海;有效性;关键因素;背景;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号