...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Superfund, Hedonics, and the Scales of Environmental Justice
【24h】

Superfund, Hedonics, and the Scales of Environmental Justice

机译:超级基金,享乐主义和环境正义的尺度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Environmental justice (EJ) is prominent in environmental policy, yet EJ research is plagued by debates over methodological procedures. A well-established economic approach, the hedonic price method, can offer guidance on one contentious aspect of EJ research: the choice of the spatial unit of analysis. Environmental managers charged with preventing or remedying inequities grapple with these framing problems. This article reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on unit choice in EJ, as well as research employing hedonic pricing to assess the spatial extent of hazardous waste site impacts. The insights from hedonics are demonstrated in a series of EJ analyses for a national inventory of Superfund sites. First, as evidence of injustice exhibits substantial sensitivity to the choice of spatial unit, hedonics suggests some units conform better to Superfund impacts than others. Second, hedonic estimates for a particular site can inform the design of appropriate tests of environmental inequity for that site. Implications for policymakers and practitioners of EJ analyses are discussed.
机译:环境正义(EJ)在环境政策中占有重要地位,但是EJ研究受到方法论方法争论的困扰。享乐主义价格法是一种行之有效的经济方法,可以为EJ研究的一个有争议的方面提供指导:分析的空间单位的选择。负责预防或纠正不公平现象的环境经理正在努力解决这些框架问题。本文回顾了EJ中单位选择的理论和经验文献,以及采用享乐定价方法评估危险废物现场影响的空间范围的研究。享乐主义的见解在一系列针对全国超级基金网站的EJ分析中得到了证明。首先,由于不公正的证据对空间单位的选择表现出相当大的敏感性,享乐主义认为某些单位比其他单位更适合超级基金的影响。其次,对特定站点的享乐性估计可以为该站点的环境不平等性的适当测试设计提供依据。讨论了对EJ分析的决策者和实践者的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号