...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and planning law journal >Restorative justice intervention in an environmental law context: Garrett v Williams, prosecutions under the Resource Management Act 1991 (NZ), and beyond
【24h】

Restorative justice intervention in an environmental law context: Garrett v Williams, prosecutions under the Resource Management Act 1991 (NZ), and beyond

机译:在环境法背景下的恢复性司法干预:Garrett诉Williams,根据《 1991年资源管理法》(NZ)提出的起诉,以及以后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article considers the applicability of restorative justice intervention in the form of restorative justice conferencing to New South Wales environmental law. Although the legislation that confers criminal jurisdiction on the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales does not specifically mention or refer to restorative justice conferencing, it would appear that such conferencing would be one way of achieving the objectives of environmental legislation, and could be considered during sentencing. Guidance can be gained from restorative justice conferencing that has taken place in the New Zealand environmental law context, as well as the seminal decision of Preston CJ in Garrett v Williams (2007) 151 LGERA 92 in the New South Wales context. Restorative justice conferencing may serve as the vehicle through which communication between victim and offender is facilitated, leading to better environmental outcomes.
机译:本文以符合新南威尔士州环境法的恢复性司法的形式,考虑恢复性司法干预的适用性。尽管在新南威尔士州土地与环境法院授予刑事管辖权的立法并未具体提及或提及恢复性司法会议,但看来这种会议将是实现环境立法目标的一种方式,可以考虑在量刑期间。可以从在新西兰环境法背景下进行的恢复性司法会议以及Preston CJ在Garrett v Williams(2007)151 LGERA 92中在新南威尔士州背景下的开创性裁决中获得指导。恢复性司法会议可以作为便利受害者与罪犯之间交流的工具,从而带来更好的环境结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号