...
首页> 外文期刊>European environment >Mainstreaming across political sectors: Assessing biodiversity policy integration in Peru
【24h】

Mainstreaming across political sectors: Assessing biodiversity policy integration in Peru

机译:跨政治部门主流化:评估秘鲁的生物多样性政策整合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mainstreaming biodiversity across political sectors and levels is a central challenge to conserving global biodiversity. This article introduces biodiversity policy integration (BPI) as an analytical approach for assessing the ecological performance of nonenvironmental sectors using the following criteria: inclusion, operationalization, coherence, capacity and weighting. To date, we know little about the barriers and enabling factors for integrating biodiversity into sector policies in resource intensive economies of the Global South. BPI in Peruvian political sectors of Agriculture and Irrigation, Economy and Finance, Energy and Mining, Production and Fishery, and Communication and Transport were analyzed based on sector strategies, related legal and strategic documents as well as qualitative expert interviews. While sectors commit to biodiversity conservation in general terms, a weak operationalization of biodiversity targets and low institutional capacity results in ineffective policy. Specific targets and indicators are not yet incorporated into sector strategies, national development planning, the evaluation of impact assessments or budget allocation. Biodiversity policies remain disconnected from the sectors' policy practices, which undermines the potential of reducing harmful incentives (Aichi target 3) and maintaining production within sustainable limits (Aichi target 4). Based on the results I identify the framing of sector-specific targets, favorable actor constellations and adaptive institutional learning arrangements as key elements for improving BPI. Facilitating agents, such as the environmental Ministry or intersectoral commissions, play a central role in generating ownership of biodiversity objectives in sector policy-making and supporting institutional learning processes.
机译:将生物多样性跨政治部门和各级主流化是保护全球生物多样性的一项主要挑战。本文介绍了生物多样性政策整合(BPI),作为一种分析方法,可使用以下标准评估非环境部门的生态绩效:包容性,运营性,一致性,能力和权重。迄今为止,我们对将生物多样性纳入全球南方资源密集型经济的部门政策的障碍和促成因素知之甚少。根据行业战略,相关法律和战略文件以及定性专家访谈,对秘鲁农业和灌溉,经济与金融,能源与采矿,生产和渔业以及通讯和运输等政治部门的BPI进行了分析。尽管各部门总体上致力于生物多样性的保护,但是生物多样性目标的执行不力和机构能力低下导致政策无效。具体目标和指标尚未纳入部门战略,国家发展规划,影响评估或预算分配的评估中。生物多样性政策仍然与部门的政策做法脱节,这削弱了减少有害奖励措施(爱知指标3)和将生产维持在可持续限度内(爱知指标4)的潜力。根据结果​​,我确定了针对特定部门的目标,有利的演员群体和适应性机构学习安排的框架,这些框架是改善BPI的关键要素。诸如环境部或部门间委员会之类的促进机构在部门决策中促进生物多样性目标的所有权和支持机构学习过程中发挥着核心作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号