...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Recent Trends in Water Use and Production for California Oil Production
【24h】

Recent Trends in Water Use and Production for California Oil Production

机译:加州石油生产用水和生产的最新趋势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent droughts and concerns about water use for petroleum extraction renew the need to inventory water use for oil production. We quantified water volumes used and produced by conventional oil production and hydraulic fracturing (HF) in California. Despite a 25% decrease in conventional oil production from 1999 to 2012, total water use increased by 30% though much of that increase was derived from reuse of produced water. Produced water volumes increased by 50%, with increasing amounts disposed in unlined evaporation ponds or released to surface water. Overall freshwater use (constituting 1.2% of the state's nonagricultural water consumption) increased by 46% during this period due to increased freshwater-intensive tertiary oil production. HF has been practiced in California for more than 30 years, accounting for 1% of total oil production in 2012 from mostly directional and vertical wells. Water use intensity for HF wells in California averaged at 3.5 vol water/vol oil production in 2012 and 2.4 vol/vol in 2013, higher than the range from literature estimates and net water use intensity of conventional production (1.2 vol/vol in 2012). Increasing water use and disposal for oil production have important implications for water management and have potentially adverse health, environmental, and ecological impacts.
机译:最近的干旱和对石油开采用水的担忧使对库存石油生产用水的需求重新产生。我们对加利福尼亚的常规采油和水力压裂(HF)所使用和生产的水量进行了量化。尽管从1999年到2012年常规石油产量下降了25%,但总用水量却增长了30%,尽管其中大部分增长来自于生产水的再利用。采出水量增加了50%,并且增加了弃置在无衬里的蒸发池中或释放到地表水中的量。在此期间,由于淡水密集型三次采油量的增加,总体淡水使用量(占该州非农业用水量的1.2%)增加了46%。 HF在加利福尼亚已经实践了30多年,占2012年大部分定向井和垂直井产油总量的1%。加利福尼亚州HF井的用水强度在2012年平均为3.5体积水/体积石油产量,在2013年为2.4体积/体积,高于文献估计和常规生产的净用水强度的范围(2012年为1.2体积/体积) 。越来越多的用水和石油生产处置对水资源管理具有重要意义,并可能对健康,环境和生态产生不利影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2016年第14期|7904-7912|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States,Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States;

    Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States,Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 73 Gothenburg, Sweden;

    Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78713-8924, United States;

    Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States,International Energy Agency, 75739, Paris Cedex 15, France;

    Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States,Precourt Energy Efficiency Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号