...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Pine Needles for the Screening of Perfluorinated Alkylated Substances (PFASs) along Ski Tracks
【24h】

Pine Needles for the Screening of Perfluorinated Alkylated Substances (PFASs) along Ski Tracks

机译：沿滑雪道筛选全氟烷基化物质（PFAS）的松针

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Perfluorinated alkylated substances (PFASs) are today considered persistent, toxic, and bioaccumulative contaminants. Perfluorooctansulfonate (PFOS) and perfluor- ooctanoic acid (PFOA) are currently listed as priority substances under the UNEP global convention for the regulation of POPs. A previous study reported higher levels of PFASs in pine needles near ski areas. Their application as stain repellents in modem outdoor clothes and in ski waxes is assumed to be a potential source. Pine trees (Pinus mugo in Slovakia and Pinus sylvestris in Norway) were chosen for sampling in ski resorts. Relative distributions, overall concentrations, trend estimates, elevation patterns, and distance from primary sources were assessed. PFOA was the predominant PFAS constituent in pine needles from Slovakia (8-93％). In Norway, the most-abundant PFAS was perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA: 3-66％). A difference in product composition (particularly in ski waxes) and differences in Norwegian and Slovakian regulations are considered to be the primary reason for these differences. Open application of PFOA in industry and products has been banned in Norway since 2011. The replacement of PFOA with short-chain substitutes is thus considered the reason for the observed pattern differences in the analyzed pine needles. Regular monitoring and screening programs are recommended.
机译：今天，全氟烷基化物质（PFAS）被认为是持久性，有毒和生物蓄积性污染物。目前，全氟辛磺酸（PFOS）和全氟辛酸（PFOA）被列为环境署全球持久性有机污染物管理公约的优先物质。先前的一项研究报道，滑雪场附近的松针中的PFAS含量较高。认为它们在现代户外衣服和滑雪蜡中作为防污剂的应用是潜在的来源。在滑雪场中选择了松树（斯洛伐克的Pinus mugo和挪威的樟子松）。评估了相对分布，总体浓度，趋势估计，海拔模式以及与主要来源的距离。 PFOA是斯洛伐克松针中主要的PFAS成分（8-93％）。在挪威，最丰富的PFAS是全氟丁酸（PFBA：3-66％）。产品成分的差异（尤其是滑雪蜡中的差异）以及挪威和斯洛伐克法规的差异被认为是造成这些差异的主要原因。自2011年以来，挪威已禁止在工业和产品中公开使用PFOA。因此，用短链替代品代替PFOA被认为是在分析的松针中观察到图案差异的原因。建议定期进行监测和筛查程序。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2016年第17期|9487-9496|共10页
  • 作者

    Maria Chropenova; Pavlina Karaskova; Roland Kallenborn; Eva Klemmova Greguskova; Pavel Cupr;

  • 作者单位

    Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, Pavilion A29, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic;

    Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, Pavilion A29, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic;

    Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science (IKBM), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P.O. Box 5003, Christian M. Falsens veg 1, NO-1432 As, Norway;

    Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, Pavilion A29, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic;

    Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, Pavilion A29, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号