...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >On Listening, Science, and Justice: A Call for Exercising Care in What Lessons We Draw from Flint
【24h】

On Listening, Science, and Justice: A Call for Exercising Care in What Lessons We Draw from Flint

机译：关于听力，科学与正义：我们应从弗林特身上汲取的教训中进行锻炼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Iapplaud the call of my colleagues Marc A. Edwards and Amy Pruden in "The Flint Water Crisis: Overturning the Research Paradigm to Advance Science and Defend Public Welfare" (10.1021/acs.est.6b03573) for science that promotes the social good. Communities across the country are in dire need of such science. Edwards and I, together with others, have spent the last 10 years exposing problems of lead in water both in my city, Washington, DC, and nationally. I am an anthropologist, cofounder of Virginia Tech's graduate class "Engineering Ethics and the Public," and principal creator of the ethnographic listening module that the coauthors present as the foundation of their Flint intervention and cornerstone of their proposed bottom-up research paradigm. I must correct a fundamental misunderstanding of the module, with clarifications critical to such a paradigm: 1. Listening to affected publics can be, and often is, important from beginning to end: In cases of environmental injustice, listening is, indeed, crucial for scoping the problem. However, as environmental health and justice advocates highlight, there are significant advantages to listening throughout scientists' engagement with communities, rather than just at the beginning. Sustained listening can bring scientists and communities into partnerships of mutual learning, decision-making, and trust. It can also create opportunities for "checks" on the effectiveness of scientists' interventions and their ability to remain attentive to the often-evolving experiences, knowledges, and goals of the publics they aim to serve.
机译：我对同事马克·爱德华兹和艾米·普鲁登在“火石水危机：颠覆研究范式，促进科学发展和捍卫公共福利”（10.1021 / acs.est.6b03573）中呼吁促进科学社会发展的呼吁表示赞赏。全国各地的社区都迫切需要这种科学。爱德华兹和我以及其他人在过去的10年中，在我所在的城市，华盛顿特区和全国范围内暴露了铅中的铅问题。我是人类学家，弗吉尼亚理工大学研究生课程“工程伦理学与公众”的共同创始人，还是人种学听力模块的主要创建者，该论文的共同作者将其作为石干预的基础和拟议的自下而上研究范式的基础。我必须纠正对该模块的基本误解，并澄清对此类范例至关重要的问题：1.听取受影响的公众从头到尾都是很重要的，而且常常很重要：在环境不公正的情况下，听取对于以下方面确实至关重要解决问题。但是，正如环境健康和正义的倡导者所强调的那样，在整个科学家与社区的互动中倾听，而不是一开始就具有很大的优势。持续的聆听可以使科学家和社区建立相互学习，决策和信任的伙伴关系。它还可以创造机会，以“检查”科学家的干预措施的有效性及其对关注的服务对象不断发展的经验，知识和目标保持关注的能力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2016年第22期|12058-12059|共2页
  • 作者

    Yanna Lambrinidou;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Science and Technology in Society National Capital Region Program Virginia Tech Falls Church, Virginia 22043, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号