...
【24h】

Response from Collins

机译:Collins的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

T. Hayes has advocated that the Syn-genta herbicide, atrazine, should be banned in the U.S. His position is based on his own studies of atra-zine's EDC effects on frogs and his assessment of work from other labs. Hayes actually started his atrazine research under commission from a Syngenta predecessor. When the sponsor hindered publication of his negative findings, he sought alternative funding and repeated, published, and expanded the work (1).rnK. R. Solomon has criticized my Viewpoint for featuring Hayes's advocacy. According to the acknowledgment statement in the paper cited in his letter, Solomon is a member of a Syngenta-funded team studying atrazine. In this cited review, he and his coauthors dispute the quality of what appears to be any and all studies that claim adverse atrazine effects. Hayes has published a critique of the Solomon group's studies (2). Clearly with atrazine, there is ongoing scientific controversy. I support Hayes's advocacy in this climate of disagreement. Tenure in U.S. universities was instituted precisely to protect the right of academics to address controversial issues.
机译:T·海耶斯(T.Hayes)提倡在美国禁止先正达除草剂阿特拉津。他的立场是基于他对阿特拉锌对青蛙的EDC效应的研究以及他在其他实验室所做的工作评估。海耶斯实际上是在先正达前身的委托下开始他的阿特拉津研​​究的。当赞助者阻止发表他的负面发现时,他寻求替代资金并重复,出版和扩展​​了研究成果(1)。 R.所罗门(R. Solomon)批评了我的观点(Hayes)的主张。根据他在信中引用的文件中的致谢声明,所罗门是先正达资助的研究at去津的团队的成员。在这篇引用的评论中,他和他的合著者对声称对at去津有不良影响的所有研究的质量提出了质疑。海耶斯发表了对所罗门小组研究的评论(2)。显然与阿特拉津有关的科学争议不断。在这种分歧的气氛下,我支持海斯的主张。美国大学的终身制正是为了保护学者解决有争议问题的权利而设立的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2009年第9期|2994-2994|共1页
  • 作者

    TERRENCE J. COLLINS;

  • 作者单位

    Carnegie Mellon University;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号