...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ergonomics >Naieve judgements of stimulus-response compatibility
【24h】

Naieve judgements of stimulus-response compatibility

机译：对刺激-反应相容性的幼稚判断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

An experiment is reported that is an extension of Payne (1995) and of Vu and Proctor (2003). These authors used various light/key arrangements to determine the ability of naive subjects to rate the usability of interface designs and found that naieve judgements were not accurate, apart from selecting a best design. In this experiment, there were one, two, four and eight arrangements of lights and response keys with varying levels of compatibility between them. Response time is shown to be determined by two main factors: the level of response uncertainty (the number of light/key combinations); the correlation between stimulus-light and response key location, accounting for up to 93% of the experimental variance. Subjective response time (SRT), or judged response time, was responsive to the level of response uncertainty and also the correlation between light/key combinations, showing good correspondence to actual reaction times. It was found that SRT showed a stronger relationship to actual response time when subjects were presented with the full set of situations that they were to respond to, prior to judgements being made, rather than just individual sets for comparison.
机译：据报道，这是佩恩（Payne）（1995）和武（Vu）和普罗克（Proctor）（2003）的扩展。这些作者使用各种灯光/按键布置来确定天真对象对界面设计的可用性进行评估的能力，并发现天真的判断不准确，除了选择最佳设计。在该实验中，灯光，响应键分别具有1、2、4和8个布置，它们之间具有不同的兼容性。响应时间由两个主要因素决定：响应不确定度（灯光/按键组合的数量）；响应时间的高低。刺激光和响应键位置之间的相关性，最多占实验方差的93％。主观响应时间（SRT）或判断的响应时间对响应不确定性的级别以及灯光/按键组合之间的相关性做出响应，显示出与实际反应时间的良好对应性。结果发现，在做出判断之前，向受试者展示他们将要应对的全部情况时，SRT与实际反应时间之间存在更强的关系，而不仅仅是用于比较的个别情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号