Sensumotor transformation of input devices and the impact on practice and task difficulty

C. SUTTER

首页> 外文期刊>Ergonomics >Sensumotor transformation of input devices and the impact on practice and task difficulty

【24h】

Sensumotor transformation of input devices and the impact on practice and task difficulty

机译：输入设备的感觉运动转换及其对练习和任务难度的影响

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

In the present study, the usability of two laptop input devices, touchpad and trackpoint, is evaluated. The focus is set on the impact of sensumotor transformation of input devices on practice and task difficulty. Thirty novices and 14 experts operated either touchpad or trackpoint over a period of 1600 trials of a point-click task. As hypothesized, novices and experts operated the touchpad by 15% faster compared to the trackpoint. For novices, performance rose distinctly and levelled off after 960 trials. This consolidation occurred earlier than reported in literature (1400-1600 trials) and, contrary to the assumption, learning was similar for touchpad and trackpoint. The impact of task difficulty dropped remarkably by practice, which points at a more general than specific task learning. In conclusion, ergonomic guidelines can be derived for the user-specific optimization of the usage of touchpad and trackpoint. Actual and potential applications of this research include the user-specific optimization of laptop input devices. Within the theoretical framework of psychomotor models, a profound knowledge of user behaviour in human - computer interaction is provided. Ergonomic guidelines can be derived for the efficient usage of laptop input devices and an optimized hardware and software design.

机译：在本研究中，评估了两个笔记本电脑输入设备（触摸板和轨迹点）的可用性。重点放在输入设备的感觉运动转换对练习和任务难度的影响上。在1600次点击事件中，有30位新手和14位专家操作了触摸板或跟踪点。如假设的那样，与跟踪点相比，新手和专家操作触摸板的速度提高了15％。对于新手来说，性能经过960次试验后明显提高并趋于稳定。这种整合发生的时间早于文献报道的次数（1400-1600次试验），并且与假设相反，触摸板和轨迹点的学习方式相似。通过实践，任务难度的影响显着下降，这表明比特定的任务学习更为笼统。总之，可以针对触摸板和轨迹点的用户特定优化推导出人体工程学准则。这项研究的实际和潜在应用包括针对笔记本电脑输入设备的用户特定优化。在心理运动模型的理论框架内，提供了人机交互中用户行为的深刻知识。可以导出人机工程学准则，以有效使用笔记本电脑输入设备并优化硬件和软件设计。

著录项

来源
《Ergonomics》 |2007年第12期|p.1999-2016|共18页
作者
C. SUTTER;
展开▼
作者单位

RWTH Aachen University, Department of Psychology, Jagerstrasse 17-19, 52056 Aachen, Germany;

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类人体工程学;人体工程学;自动化技术、计算机技术;
关键词
input device; sensumotor transformation; motor skill learning; practice; task difficulty;

机译：输入设备;感觉运动转换;运动技能学习;实践;任务难度;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Evaluating input device usability as a function of task difficulty in a tracking task [J] . Rupp Michael A., Oppold Paul, McConnell Daniel S. Ergonomics . 2015,第5期

机译：根据跟踪任务中的任务难度评估输入设备的可用性
2. Standing task difficulty related increase in agonist-agonist and agonist-antagonist common inputs are driven by corticospinal and subcortical inputs respectively [J] . Tulika Nandi, Tibor Hortobágyi, Helco G. van Keeken, Scientific reports. . 2019,第1期

机译：与站立任务难度相关的激动剂-激动剂和激动剂-拮抗剂共同输入的增加分别由皮质脊髓和皮质下输入驱动
3. Effects of sensorimotor transformations with graphical input devices [J] . C. Sutter, J. Müsseler, L. Bardos Behaviour & Information Technology . 2011,第3期

机译：图形输入设备对感觉运动转换的影响
4. Effects of Practice with Foot- and Hand-Operated Secondary Input Devices on Performance of a Word-Processing Task [C] . Fredrick P. Garcia, Kim-Phuong L. Vu Human interface and the management of information . 2009

机译：脚和手操作的辅助输入设备的练习对文字处理任务的影响
5. Effects of practice with foot- and hand-operated secondary input devices on word processing task performance [D] . Garcia, Fredrick P. 2009

机译：手动和手动操作的辅助输入设备练习对文字处理任务性能的影响
6. Standing task difficulty related increase in agonist-agonist and agonist-antagonist common inputs are driven by corticospinal and subcortical inputs respectively [O] . Tulika Nandi, Tibor Hortobágyi, Helco G. van Keeken, -1

机译：与站立任务难度相关的激动剂-激动剂和激动剂-拮抗剂共同输入的增加分别由皮质脊髓和皮质下输入驱动
7. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines) 11This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in September 2002, the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in August 2002, and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology in August 2002.22The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur. The conflict of interest information for the writing committee members is posted on the ACC, AHA, and NASPE Web sites with the full-length version of the update.33When citing this document, the ACC, the AHA, and NASPE would appreciate the following citation format: Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Kerber RE, Naccarelli GV, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Winters SL. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol2002;40:1703–19.44Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). A single copy of the complete guidelines is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699 (ask for No. 71-0237). To obtain a copy of the Summary Article, ask for reprint No. 71-0236. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4426, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kbradle@lww.com.55(J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1703–19.)66©2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Gregoratos Gabriel, Abrams Jonathan, Epstein Andrew E, 2002

机译：ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会将更新1998年起搏器指南） 11该文件于2002年9月获得美国心脏病学会基金会董事会的批准，于2002年8月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准，并于2002年8月获得北美起搏和电生理学会的批准。22ACC / AHA工作组《实践指南》将尽一切努力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审核，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。撰写委员会成员的利益冲突信息已发布在更新的完整版本的ACC，AHA和NASPE网站上。33当引用本文档时，ACC，AHA和NASPE将不胜感激。格式：Gregoratos G，Abrams J，Epstein AE，Freedman RA，Hayes DL，Hlatky MA，Kerber RE，Naccarelli GV，Schoenfeld MH，Silka MJ，Winters SL。 ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会更新了1998年起搏器指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol2002； 40：1703–19.44复制：此文档可在ACC（www.acc.org）和AHA（www.americanheart.org）的万维网站点上找到。您可以致电800-253-4636（仅限美国）或写信给美国心脏病学会资源中心，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，获得一份完整的指南（请致电71-0237））。要获得摘要文章的副本，请索要第71-0236号转载。要购买其他重印本（指定版本和重印本号码）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；否则，请重新发送。 1000份或更多，请致电410-528-4426，传真410-528-4264或发送电子邮件至kbradle@lww.com.55（J Am Coll Cardiol 2002； 40：1703–19。）66©2002美国心脏病学基金会基金会和美国心脏协会有限公司
8. Effects of Easy-To-Difficult, Difficult-Only, and Mixed-Difficulty Practice onPerformance of Simulated Gunnery Tasks [R] . Bliss, J. P., Lampton, D. R., Boldovici, J. A. 1992

机译：易难，难度和混合难度练习对模拟炮兵任务性能的影响

Sensumotor transformation of input devices and the impact on practice and task difficulty

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅