• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ethics and information technology >Coercion or empowerment? Moderation of content in Wikipedia as 'essentially contested' bureaucratic rules
【24h】

Coercion or empowerment? Moderation of content in Wikipedia as 'essentially contested' bureaucratic rules

机译：强迫还是授权？ Wikipedia中的内容审核是“本质上有争议的”官僚规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In communities of user-generated content, systems for the management of content and/or their contributors are usually accepted without much protest. Not so, however, in the case of Wikipedia, in which the proposal to introduce a system of review for new edits (in order to counter vandalism) led to heated discussions. This debate is analysed, and arguments of both supporters and opponents (of English, German and French tongue) are extracted from Wikipedian archives. In order to better understand this division of the minds, an analogy is drawn with theories of bureaucracy as developed for real-life organizations. From these it transpires that bureaucratic rules may be perceived as springing from either a control logic or an enabling logic. In Wikipedia, then, both perceptions were at work, depending on the underlying views of participants. Wik-ipedians either rejected the proposed scheme (because it is antithetical to their conception of Wikipedia as a community) or endorsed it (because it is consonant with their conception of Wikipedia as an organization with clearly defined boundaries). Are other open-content communities susceptible to the same kind of 'essential contestation'?
机译：在用户生成的内容社区中，通常无需过多抗议即可接受用于内容和/或其贡献者管理的系统。但是，对于Wikipedia而言并非如此，在该提案中引入了一种对新编辑进行审查的系统（以应对故意破坏的提议）引起了热烈的讨论。分析了这场辩论，并从维基百科档案中提取了支持者和反对者（英语，德语和法语）的论点。为了更好地理解这种思想分歧，我们采用了针对现实组织的官僚主义理论进行类比。由此可见，官僚规则可能被视为源于控制逻辑或使能逻辑。然后，在维基百科中，两种看法都在起作用，这取决于参与者的基本观点。维基百科作者拒绝了该提议的方案（因为它与他们将Wikipedia定义为一个社区是对立的）或赞成该方案（因为它与他们的Wikipedia的定义明确界定的组织相符）。其他开放内容社区是否容易受到相同类型的“基本竞争”影响？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号