...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ethics and information technology >P2P networks and the Verizon v. RIAA case: Implications for personal privacy and intellectual property
【24h】

P2P networks and the Verizon v. RIAA case: Implications for personal privacy and intellectual property

机译：P2P网络和Verizon诉RIAA案：对个人隐私和知识产权的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this paper, we examine some ethical implications of a controversial court decision in the United States involving Verizon (an Internet Service Provider or ISP) and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). In particular, we analyze the impacts this decision has for personal privacy and intellectual property. We begin with a brief description of the controversies and rulings in this case. This is followed by a look at some of the challenges that peer-to-peer (P2P) systems, used to share digital information, pose for our legal and moral systems. We then examine the concept of privacy to better understand how the privacy of Internet users participating in P2P file-sharing practices is threatened under certain interpretations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the United States. In particular, we examine the implications of this act for a new form of "panoptic surveillance" that can be carried out by organizations such as the RIAA. We next consider the tension between privacy and property-right interests that emerges in the Verizon case, and we examine a model proposed by Jessica Litman for distributing information over the Internet in a way that respects both privacy and property rights. We conclude by arguing that in the Verizon case, we should presume in favor of privacy as the default position, and we defend the view that a presumption should be made in favor of sharing (rather than hoarding) digital information. We also conclude that in the Verizon case, a presumption in favor of property would have undesirable effects and would further legitimize the commodification of digital information - a recent trend that is reinforced by certain interpretations of the DMCA on the part of lawmakers and by aggressive tactics used by the RIAA.
机译：在本文中，我们研究了涉及Verizon（互联网服务提供商或ISP）和美国唱片业协会（RIAA）的美国法庭上有争议的裁决的一些伦理意义。特别是，我们分析了此决定对个人隐私和知识产权的影响。我们首先简要介绍这种情况下的争议和裁决。接下来，我们将探讨用于共享数字信息的点对点（P2P）系统对我们的法律和道德体系提出的一些挑战。然后，我们研究隐私的概念，以更好地了解参与美国P2P文件共享实践的Internet用户的隐私如何受到美国《数字千年版权法案》（DMCA）某些解释的威胁。特别是，我们研究了该法案对可以由RIAA等组织实施的新型“全景监视”的含义。接下来，我们考虑在Verizon案中出现的隐私与产权利益之间的紧张关系，并研究由Jessica Litman提出的一种模型，该模型通过尊重隐私和产权的方式在Internet上分发信息。我们通过争论得出结论，在Verizon案中，我们应该假定赞成将隐私作为默认位置，并且捍卫一种观点，即应假定赞成共享（而不是ho积）数字信息。我们还得出结论，在Verizon案中，有利于财产的推定将产生不良影响，并将进一步使数字信息商品化合法化-立法者对DMCA的某些解释以及激进的策略进一步强化了这一近期趋势。由RIAA使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号