首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, Place and Environment >Reflections on Curren and Metzger
【24h】

Reflections on Curren and Metzger

机译:对电流和梅茨格的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Curren and Metzger focus on the inadequacy of the Brundtland commission sustainability definition (United Nations Commission on Environment & Development, 1987). However, very few differences need apply. This response begins with the Brundtland definition and then links to the discussion of Living Well by building upon other threads of sustainability. The oft-cited sustainable development definition from the Brundtland Report states: 'Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'. It has been rightly criticized for being overly vague. However, the critiques in the living well discussion (Curren and Metzger) can be incorporated by more clearly operationalizing Brundtland. I will address this by clarifying an interpretation of (a) needs, (b) the present and (c) generations. I then tie them together with the notion of living well, expand on the critique of development and conclude with a discussion on the role of sustainability education.
机译:Curren和Metzger着眼于Brundtland委员会可持续性定义的不足(联合国环境与发展委员会,1987年)。但是,需要应用的差异很小。这种回应始于布伦特兰(Brundtland)的定义,然后通过建立在可持续性的其他思路上,与“活井”的讨论联系起来。布伦特兰报告(Brundtland Report)中经常引用的可持续发展定义指出:“可持续发展是指在不损害子孙后代满足其自身需求的能力的前提下,满足当前需求的发展”。批评它过于含糊是正确的。但是,通过更明确地实施布伦特兰,可以将对居住井讨论的批评(Curren和Metzger)纳入其中。我将通过澄清对(a)需求,(b)当代和(c)世代的解释来解决这个问题。然后,我将他们与“好生活”的概念联系在一起,扩大对发展的批判,最后讨论可持续教育的作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics, Place and Environment》 |2017年第3期|259-262|共4页
  • 作者

    Geoffrey Habron;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号