首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, policy and environment >Environmental Justice as a Foundation for a Process-based Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation: A Commentary on Brooks
【24h】

Environmental Justice as a Foundation for a Process-based Framework for Adaptation and Mitigation: A Commentary on Brooks

机译:环境正义作为基于过程的适应和减缓框架的基础:布鲁克斯评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Brooks convincingly makes the case that the current arguments for climate mitigation and adaptation fail. Each of the arguments discussed by Brooks appeals to end-state solutions that are some combination of poorly defined, inadequate, inappropriate, or are impossible. Thus, those arguments provide us with relatively limited guidance regarding what we should do about climate change. I hope to extend Brooks' article by providing a rough sketch of how we might think about responding to climate change that does not depend upon achieving a particular end state.
机译:布鲁克斯令人信服地指出,目前有关缓解气候变化和适应气候变化的论据失败了。布鲁克斯讨论的每个论点都呼吁最终状态解决方案,这些解决方案是定义不明确,不足,不合适或不可能的某种组合。因此,这些论点为我们应对气候变化提供了相对有限的指导。我希望通过提供一个粗略的草图来扩展Brooks的文章,该草图概述了我们如何思考不依赖于达到特定最终状态的应对气候变化问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics, policy and environment》 |2016年第2期|145-149|共5页
  • 作者

    Clement Loo;

  • 作者单位

    Environmental Studies, University of Minnesota, Morris, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号