...
首页> 外文期刊>Ethnopolitics: Formerly Global Review of Ethnopolitics >The Wars of Who Belongs Where: The Unstable Politics of Autochthony on Kenya's Mt Elgon
【24h】

The Wars of Who Belongs Where: The Unstable Politics of Autochthony on Kenya's Mt Elgon

机译:谁属于谁的战争:肯尼亚埃尔贡山自暴自弃的不稳定政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper examines the politics of belonging or autochthony on Mt Elgon in western Kenya, and associated occasions of inter- and intra-communal violence. The paper argues that divergent claims of ‘who is who’ and ‘who belongs where and why’ lie at the heart of these periods of violence, and suggests that the uncertainty of ‘belonging’ is due not just to the vagueness of the term and histories of migration, as is often argued, but to cross-cutting layers of ethnic appellations, which result from changes to administrative boundaries and ethnic terminology. Second, the paper argues that a violent politics of belonging has been exacerbated by a return to multi-party politics and larger global trends, but that it has not been caused by such developments. Instead, the case study suggests that the fundamental explanation of confrontation lies with the appeal and use of an inherently exclusive and unstable discourse of culturally distinct communities with discrete homelands that is then used by politicians and ordinary citizens in contexts of heightened competition, increased attention to the local, and uneven impact of ‘globalization’ and ‘development’. Finally, the case highlights the important role that new technologies play in contemporary public discussions and understandings of a collective self.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2011.596671
机译:本文研究了肯尼亚西部艾尔贡山(Mt Elgon)的归属政治或自治制度,以及社区间和社区内暴力的相关场合。该论文认为,在这些暴力时期的核心是“谁是谁”和“谁属于哪里以及为什么”的不同主张,并指出“财产”的不确定性是由于正如人们经常争论的那样,这不仅涉及移民用语和移民历史的模糊性,还涉及跨族裔称谓的层次,这是由于行政边界和族裔用语的改变而引起的。其次,该论文认为,归还多党政治和更大的全球趋势会加剧归属的暴力政治,但这并不是这种发展造成的。相反,案例研究表明,对抗的根本解释在于对具有离散家园的文化独特社区的固有排他性和不稳定话语的吸引力和使用,然后政治家和普通公民在竞争加剧,关注度提高的情况下使用这种话语。对“全球化”和“发展”的局部且不均衡的影响。最后,该案例突显了新技术在当代公众讨论和对集体自我的理解中所起的重要作用。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter, technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2011.596671

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号