...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The European Journal of Public Health >Health, alcohol and EU law: understanding the impact of European single market law on alcohol policies
【24h】

Health, alcohol and EU law: understanding the impact of European single market law on alcohol policies

机译：卫生，酒精和欧盟法律：了解欧洲单一市场法对酒精政策的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: many professionals in the alcohol field see the role of the the European Court of Justice (ECJ) as negative for health. This review examines ECJ and European Free Trade Association (EFTA) case law in the context of two broader debates: firstly the extension of European Union (EU) law into alcohol policy (the ‘juridification’ of alcohol policy), and secondly the extent to which alcohol policy is an example of the dominance of ‘negative integration’ (the removal of trade-distorting policy) over ‘positive integration’ (the creation of European alcohol policies). Methods: a comprehensive review of all ECJ/EFTA Court cases on alcohol, with interpretation aided by a secondary review on alcohol and EU law and the broader health and trade field. Results: from looking at taxation, minimum pricing, advertising and monopoly policies, the extension of the scope of the these courts over alcohol policy is unquestionable. However, the ECJ and EFTA Court have been prepared to prioritise health over trade concerns when considering alcohol policies, providing certain conditions have been met. Conclusion: while a partial juridification of alcohol policy has led to the negative integration of alcohol policies, this effect is not as strong as sometimes thought; EU law is more health friendly than it is perceived to be, and its impact on levels of alcohol-related harm appears low. Nevertheless, lessons emerge for policymakers concerned about the legality of alcohol policies under EU law. More generally, those concerned with alcohol and health should pay close attention to developments in EU law given their importance for public health policy on alcohol.
机译：背景：酒精领域的许多专业人员认为欧洲法院（ECJ）的作用不利于健康。这次审查在两次更广泛的辩论中考察了欧洲法院和欧洲自由贸易协会（EFTA）的判例法：首先是将欧盟法律扩展至酒精政策（酒精政策的“合法化”），其次是哪种酒精政策是“负整合”（取消扭曲贸易的政策）相对于“积极整合”（创建欧洲酒精政策）的主导。方法：对ECJ / EFTA法院关于酒精的所有案件进行全面审查，并通过对酒精和欧盟法律以及更广泛的健康和贸易领域的二次审查进行解释。结果：从税收，最低价格，广告和垄断政策的角度来看，这些法院对酒精政策的扩展范围是毫无疑问的。但是，欧洲法院和欧洲自由贸易区法院已准备好在考虑某些酒精条件时，在考虑酒精政策时将健康置于贸易关注之上。结论：虽然对酒精政策的部分司法化导致了酒精政策的负面整合，但这种效果并不像人们想象的那么强烈；欧盟法律比人们认为的更为健康，对酒精相关伤害的影响似乎较低。然而，对于关注欧盟法律下的酒精政策合法性的政策制定者而言，仍然可以吸取教训。更一般而言，与酒精和健康有关的人们应密切关注欧盟法律的发展，因为它们对酒精公共健康政策至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The European Journal of Public Health》 |2008年第4期|p.392-398|共7页
  • 作者

    Ben Baumberg1 and Peter Anderson2;

  • 作者单位

    1 Policy and Research Officer, Institute of Alcohol Studies, UK (www.ias.org.uk) and Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE), London School of Economics and Political Science, UK 2 International public health consultant, Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号