...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European energy and environmental law review >The Dutch Supreme Court's Climate Judgment: Its Consequences and Implications for Business - Revolution Through Litigation
【24h】

The Dutch Supreme Court's Climate Judgment: Its Consequences and Implications for Business - Revolution Through Litigation

机译：荷兰最高法院的气候判决：其后果和对业务的影响 - 通过诉讼革命

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Supreme Court's ruling in the Urgenda climate case requires that the Netherlands government step up the fight against climate change to reduce CO_2 emissions by the end of 2020 by 25% (relative to 1990). Urgent action against 'dangerous climate change' was deemed scientifically necessary to safeguard the right to life of Netherlands residents. Upon close analysis, however, this revolutionary judgment appears to be based on uncritical examination of the factual evidence presented by Urgenda, judicial misappropriation of legislative power, expansive interpretations of the applicable law, careless or incomplete reasoning, and intentional omissions. Due to these deficiencies, the court's ruling will have serious consequences for future policy-making in The Netherlands and the liability exposure of companies in relation to climate change. This article analyses the judgment and discusses its implications.
机译：最高法院在Urgenda气候案件中的裁决要求荷兰政府加强对抗气候变化的斗争，以减少2020年底的CO_2排放量25％（相对于1990年）。对“危险气候变化”的紧急行动被视为科学上有必要保障荷兰居民的生命权。然而，在密切分析后，这种革命性判决似乎基于Urgenda提出的事实证据，司法挪用立法权，适用法律，粗心或不完整的推理以及故意遗漏的令人沮丧的解释。由于这些缺陷，法院的执政将对荷兰的未来政策制定以及公司与气候变化有关的责任风险产生严重后果。本文分析了判决并讨论了其影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号