• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European environmental law review >Multilateral Organisations, Fossil Fuels and Energy Law and Policy: The Tower of Babel Re-visited
【24h】

Multilateral Organisations, Fossil Fuels and Energy Law and Policy: The Tower of Babel Re-visited

机译：多边组织，化石燃料与能源法律和政策：重访巴别塔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In recent weeks, it appears that regulatory and related policy interest in OPEC and other oil producers rises in direct proportion to the price of oil. On 26-27 June, European Union representatives will be travelling to Siberia in order to seek new regulatory arrangements on oil and gas imports, as well as concessions in relation to Western European investment in the Russian energy sector. Prime Minister Gordon Brown is in Saudi Arabia, seeking regulatory concessions related to higher production levels for oil in order to force prices down. Against this backdrop, he has threatened to spend up to ￡100 billion (€ 127 billion) weaning citizens off the expensive energy imports that threaten family budgets. Similarly, in the recent presidential primaries in the United States, Hillary Clinton promised to bring legal action against OPEC in relation to its cartel status. Notwithstanding the implicit evidence of the weak bargaining power of consumer nations that are forced to visit producer nations for "constructive talks", there is much to commend scholarly attention to the role of regional and multilateral institutions in relation to fossil fuels regulation at this time. This article analyses the role of these institutions (Section 1) particularly in relation to OPEC, against the backdrop of the energy dependency (Section 2) that has evolved among leading oil consumer nations. In Section 3, we scrutinize dual energy pricing, as well as the trade compatibility of one of the EU's answers to oil dependency, the Renewable Energy Sources Directive. We then proceed to analyse unilateral and multilateral litigation prospects in respect of OPEC's export regulatory control practices (Section 4) prior to offering some constructive concluding remarks. In view of the current third wave international energy crisis, it is right that multilateralism should serve as a sensible way forward given the abject failure of individual consumer states thus far to both advance a sustainable energy security regulatory and policy framework and, in an integrated fashion, to address the challenges of climate change.
机译：在最近几周中，对欧佩克和其他石油生产国的监管及相关政策兴趣似乎与石油价格成正比增长。 6月26日至27日，欧盟代表将前往西伯利亚，以寻求有关石油和天然气进口以及西欧在俄罗斯能源领域投资方面的优惠的新监管安排。总理戈登·布朗（Gordon Brown）在沙特阿拉伯，寻求与石油产量提高相关的监管让步，以压低价格。在这种背景下，他威胁要动用高达1000亿英镑（合1270亿欧元）的奶粉，以摆脱对家庭预算造成威胁的昂贵能源进口。同样，在最近的美国总统初选中，希拉里·克林顿承诺就欧佩克的卡特尔地位提起法律诉讼。尽管有隐性证据表明，消费国的讨价还价能力弱，这些消费国被迫拜访生产国进行“建设性对话”，但目前有很多值得称赞的学者关注区域和多边机构在化石燃料监管方面的作用。本文在主要石油消费国之间发展的能源依赖性（第2节）的背景下，分析了这些机构（第1节）的作用，特别是在欧佩克方面。在第3节中，我们将仔细研究双重能源价格，以及欧盟对石油依赖的答案之一可再生能源指令的贸易兼容性。然后，我们在提供一些建设性的结论之前，就欧佩克的出口监管控制做法（第4节）分析单方面和多边诉讼的前景。鉴于当前的第三波国际能源危机，鉴于各个消费者国家迄今为止的惨败，多边主义应作为明智的前进之路，这既正确地推进了可持续的能源安全监管和政策框架，又以一种综合的方式进行，这是正确的。 ，以应对气候变化的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号