• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European environmental law review >The Brazilian Tyres Case: Competing Trade And Non-trade Interests And Competing Jurisdictions Between Mercosur And Wto
【24h】

The Brazilian Tyres Case: Competing Trade And Non-trade Interests And Competing Jurisdictions Between Mercosur And Wto

机译：巴西轮胎案：贸易和非贸易利益竞争，南共市与世贸组织之间的管辖权竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Brazilian efforts to regulate remoulded and retreaded tires on the basis of human health and environmental considerations have been challenged by both the European Community and Uruguay in WTO and MERCOSUR dispute settlement fora respectively. Such cases are part of and belong to the evolving history of so-called "trade and environment" disputes that have appeared over the past 20 years. Since the infamous and divisive "Tuna-Dolphin" dispute litigated at the GA TT in 1991, European and international attention has focused increasingly on this apparently divisive field of law. Rather encouragingly, the more recent case law is moving to were a more balanced and proportionate approach to the trade-environment interface. Ironically, in the wake of the EU-Brazil WTO retreaded tyre dispute, the German nongovernmental organization Form for Environment and Development has sought to encourage EU Trade Commissioner Mandelson to withdraw his appeal of the WTO decision stating that "(A)n appeal of the panel report would be an assault on the health needs of the poor and the environment" and noting that "the European Community has defended several European environmental and health policies at the WTO (asbestos, GMO imports, hormones in beef) and will likely have to defend others in the future. It does not make sense to challenge a decision that will be useful for arguing pending and future environment and health cases at the WTO." This article examines the WTO and MERCOSUR dispute settlement challenges and the interaction between the two dispute settlement bodies prior to providing some concluding analysis on balancing health and environment and trade law considerations.
机译：欧洲共同体和乌拉圭在世贸组织和南锥体共同市场争端解决论坛上分别挑战了巴西基于人类健康和环境考虑来管理重塑和翻新轮胎的努力。这些案件是过去20年间发生的所谓“贸易与环境”争端不断演变的历史的一部分。自从1991年在GA TT提起臭名昭著且具有分裂性的“金枪鱼-海豚”争端以来，欧洲和国际上的关注都越来越集中在这个显然具有分裂性的法律领域。令人鼓舞的是，最新的判例法正朝着更加平衡和比例化的贸易-环境接口方针迈进。具有讽刺意味的是，在欧盟与巴西之间的世贸组织（WTO）重新审理轮胎争端之后，德国非政府组织环境与发展组织（Form for Environment and Development）试图鼓励欧盟贸易专员曼德尔森（Mandelson）撤回其对世贸组织决定的上诉，其中指出“小组报告将是对穷人和环境的健康需求的攻击”，并指出“欧洲共同体为WTO捍卫了欧洲的一些环境和健康政策（石棉，转基因生物的进口，牛肉中的激素），可能将不得不挑战一个对世贸组织有待解决的和未来的环境与健康案件进行辩论的有用决定是没有道理的。”本文在提供有关健康与环境平衡以及贸易法考虑因素的结论分析之前，研究了WTO和MERCOSUR争端解决的挑战以及两个争端解决机构之间的互动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号