• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European environmental law review >Regulating Nanotechnology in the European Union
【24h】

Regulating Nanotechnology in the European Union

机译：欧盟规范纳米技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is often a quote's fate to be taken completely out of context. And undoubtedly this is also true for the above statement. The above extract illustrates the exasperation sometimes felt by those at the receiving end of regulation for new technologies. This is in particular the case vis-d-vis the EU answer to regulatory, especially Safety, Health and Environmental concerns. For the regulation of nanotechnology, the presumption is that the EU will adopt a cautious approach, whether or not based on the current regulation. Much like in the US and elsewhere, there is no tailor-made regulatory framework for nano. Part of industry fears that REACH, the new EU's chemical policy, may be used as a source of inspiration, which would imply a qualified shift of the burden of proof of safety, from the authorities to the manufacturer. Product liability is less likely to play a preponderant role, at least at the EU level (as opposed to the Member States), as the EU's harmonisation in this field in practice is limited only.
机译：完全脱离上下文，这通常是报价的命运。毫无疑问，上述声明也是如此。以上摘录说明了新技术法规的接受者有时会感到不满。尤其是相对于欧盟对法规，特别是安全，健康和环境问题的回答而言。对于纳米技术的法规，假定欧盟将采取谨慎的方法，无论是否基于当前法规。就像在美国和其他地方一样，没有针对纳米的量身定制的监管框架。业内部分人士担心，新的欧盟化学政策REACH可能会被用作灵感来源，这暗示着安全证明责任从主管部门到制造商的转移。产品责任至少在欧盟范围内（相对于成员国）不太可能发挥主导作用，因为在实践中欧盟在这一领域的协调是有限的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号