...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Did the Database Directive Actually Harmonise the Database Copyright? Football Dataco Ltd v Brittens Pools Ltd and the ECJ's Rules against Subsistence of Database Copyright in Fixtures Lists
【24h】

Did the Database Directive Actually Harmonise the Database Copyright? Football Dataco Ltd v Brittens Pools Ltd and the ECJ's Rules against Subsistence of Database Copyright in Fixtures Lists

机译：数据库指令是否实际上协调了数据库版权？ Football Dataco Ltd诉Brittens Pools Ltd以及ECJ禁止灯具清单中存在数据库版权的规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This comment discusses the recent ruling of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Football Dataco Ltd v Brittens Pools, on the protection of football fixtures lists within the database copyright, answering the questions referred by the Court of Appeal. In 2004, the ECJ held that such lists cannot, in principle, be protected on the basis of sui generis right provided for under the Database Directive. In the present case the ECJ was called upon to expand upon its case law regarding the possibility of protecting football fixtures lists on the basis of the Database Directive, not by sui generis right, but by copyright. The ECJ interprets the meaning of an author's own intellectual creation-the standard of originality for databases copyright-and discusses whether national rights in the nature of copyright can exist in any other form in a database, other than as provided for in the Database Directive.
机译：该评论讨论了欧洲法院最近在Football Dataco Ltd诉Brittens Pools案中关于保护数据库版权中的足球器材列表的裁决，回答了上诉法院转交的问题。欧洲法院在2004年裁定，原则上不能根据数据库指令规定的专有权保护此类清单。在本案中，欧洲法院被要求扩大其关于根据数据库指令保护足球器材清单的可能性的判例法，而不是基于专有权，而是基于版权。欧洲法院解释了作者本人的知识创造的意义（数据库版权原创性的标准），并讨论了版权性质的国家权利是否可以数据库中的其他形式存在，而不是数据库指令中规定的形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号