...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of development research >The DAC is Dead, Long Live the DCF? A Comparative Analysis of the OECD Development Assistance Committee and the UN Development Cooperation Forum
【24h】

The DAC is Dead, Long Live the DCF? A Comparative Analysis of the OECD Development Assistance Committee and the UN Development Cooperation Forum

机译：DAC死了，DCF万岁？经合组织发展援助​​委员会与联合国发展合作论坛的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The establishment of the United Nations Development Cooperation Forum (DCF) is widely regarded as a major challenge for the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. While many observers expect the DAC's development role in international development to be diminishing to the benefit of the DCF, no studies have been devoted to this topic. This article addresses the impact of the establishment of DCF on the DAC. Through a combination of semi-structured interviews, document analysis and participatory observations, we conduct a comparative analysis of both institutions to asses their input, output and throughput legitimacy. Our findings show that the DCF does not pose a threat to the DAC. We argue that (i) the debate has neglected the effectiveness and decision-making cultures of both institutions and (ii) the gap between the DAC and DCF in terms of inclusiveness has become less pronounced than is often suggested.
机译：联合国发展合作论坛（DCF）的成立被广泛认为是经济合作与发展组织发展援助​​委员会（DAC）的一项重大挑战。尽管许多观察家认为DAC在国际发展中的发展作用正在减弱，以利于DCF，但尚未对此主题进行任何研究。本文介绍了建立DCF对DAC的影响。通过半结构化访谈，文档分析和参与性观察的结合，我们对这两个机构进行了比较分析，以评估其投入，产出和生产能力的合法性。我们的发现表明，DCF不会对DAC构成威胁。我们认为，（i）辩论忽略了两个机构的有效性和决策文化，（ii）DAC和DCF在包容性方面的差距变得不那么普遍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号