...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of engineering education >A third approach beyond the false dichotomy between teacher-and student-centred approaches in the engineering classroom
【24h】

A third approach beyond the false dichotomy between teacher-and student-centred approaches in the engineering classroom

机译：工程课堂中以教师和学生为中心的方法之间的错误二分法之外的第三种方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Most of the contemporary critiques of university teaching are variants of a central argument that sets up a polarity between socalled 'traditional' teaching, often termed 'teacher-centred' and 'transmissive', and approaches that by contrast are considered 'student-centred', often also referred to with the phrase 'active learning'. This editorial argues that it is important for engineering educators to be able to interrogate these calls for change, drawing on an informed sense of 'evidence-based practice' in education. Drawing on scholarship from higher education research, it is suggested that the polarity typical to these debates is actually a false dichotomy, and what is needed to foster high-quality student learning is a third approach to teaching that skillfully combines a focus on knowledge with pedagogical strategies that foster student engagement.
机译：当代大学教学的大多数批评都是中心论点的变体，这种论点在所谓的“传统”教学（通常被称为“以教师为中心”和“传递性”）之间建立了极性，而相反的方法被认为是“以学生为中心”。 ，通常也称为“主动学习”。这篇社论认为，工程教育工作者必须充分了解教育中“循证实践”的知识，才能审视这些要求变革的要求。借鉴高等教育研究的奖学金，建议这些辩论的典型极性实际上是错误的二分法，而促进高质量学生学习所需要的是第三种教学方法，该方法巧妙地将关注点与教学方法结合在一起促进学生参与的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号