...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of engineering education >How authors did it - a methodological analysis of recent engineering education research papers in the European Journal of Engineering Education
【24h】

How authors did it - a methodological analysis of recent engineering education research papers in the European Journal of Engineering Education

机译:作者是如何做到的–对《欧洲工程教育杂志》上最近的工程教育研究论文进行的方法论分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We investigated research processes applied in recent publications in the European Journal of Engineering Education (EJEE), exploring how papers link to theoretical work and how research processes have been designed and reported. We analysed all 155 papers published in EJEE in 2009, 2010 and 2013, classifying the papers using a taxonomy of research processes in engineering education research (EER) (Malmi et al. 2012). The majority of the papers presented either empirical work (59%) or were case reports (27%). Our main findings are as follows: (1) EJEE papers build moderately on a wide selection of theoretical work; (2) a great majority of papers have a clear research strategy, but data analysis methods are mostly simple descriptive statistics or simple/undocumented qualitative research methods; and (3) there are significant shortcomings in reporting research questions, methodology and limitations of studies. Our findings are consistent with and extend analyses of EER papers in other publishing venues; they help to build a clearer picture of the research currently published in EJEE and allow us to make recommendations for consideration by the editorial team of the journal. Our employed procedure also provides a framework that can be applied to monitor future global evolution of this and other EER journals.
机译:我们调查了欧洲工程教育杂志(EJEE)最新出版物中应用的研究过程,探讨了论文如何与理论工作联系起来以及研究过程是如何设计和报告的。我们分析了2009年,2010年和2013年在EJEE上发表的所有155篇论文,并使用工程教育研究(EER)中的研究过程分类法对论文进行了分类(Malmi等,2012)。大部分论文都提供了实证研究(59%)或案例报告(27%)。我们的主要发现如下:(1)EJEE论文适度地建立在广泛的理论工作之上; (2)绝大多数论文都有明确的研究策略,但数据分析方法主要是简单的描述统计或简单/未记录的定性研究方法; (3)在报告研究问题,方法和研究局限性方面存在重大缺陷。我们的发现与其他出版场所对EER论文的分析相吻合并进行了扩展;它们有助于更清晰地了解EJEE中当前发表的研究,并允许我们提出建议,以供该期刊的编辑团队考虑。我们采用的程序还提供了一个框架,可用于监视此期刊和其他EER期刊的未来全球发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号