• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of information systems >Doing The Politics Of Technological Decision Making: Due Process And The Debate About Identity Cards In The U.k.
【24h】

Doing The Politics Of Technological Decision Making: Due Process And The Debate About Identity Cards In The U.k.

机译：进行技术决策的政治：英国的正当程序和有关身份证的辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The U.K. Government, in presenting its proposals for biometric identity cards, made strong claims about the technology and science underlying the proposed National Identity Scheme. In this paper, we use insights from science and technology studies (STS), particularly Latour's 'Politics of Nature' argument, to analyse the parliamentary debates about the technological and scientific aspects of the proposals. The authors were part of a team that produced a report that raised a series of perplexities about the Scheme in an attempt to counter the short-circuiting of discussion of these perplexities in the parliamentary debate. The paper analyses the government's attempts at short-circuiting in light of Latour's argument and the introduction of perplexities by our report. It demonstrates the extent to which this form of STS can enhance political debate about technological decisions.
机译：英国政府在提出有关生物识别身份证的提案时，对拟议的国民身份证计划所基于的技术和科学提出了强烈要求。在本文中，我们使用来自科学技术研究（STS）的见解，尤其是拉图尔（Latour）的“自然政治”论据来分析有关提案技术和科学方面的议会辩论。作者是一个团队的成员，该团队编写了一份报告，提出了有关该计划的一系列困惑，以试图消除议会辩论中对这些困惑的讨论的不足。本文根据拉图尔（Latour）的论点和我们报告中引入的困惑来分析政府的短路尝试。它表明了这种形式的STS可以在多大程度上增强有关技术决策的政治辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号