• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of International Law >Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime
【24h】

Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime

机译：重新设计欧洲人权法院：嵌入性是欧洲人权制度的深层结构原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is the crown jewel of the world's most advanced international system for protecting civil and political liberties. In recent years, however, the ECtHR has become a victim of its own success. The Court now faces a docket crisis of massive proportions, the consequence of the growing number of states subject to its jurisdiction, its favourable public reputation, its expansive interpretations of individual liberties, a distrust of domestic judiciaries in some countries, and entrenched human rights problems in others. In response to this growing backlog of individual complaints, the Council of Europe has, over the last five years, considered numerous proposals to restructure the European human rights regime and redesign the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This article argues that these proposals should be understood not as ministerial changes in supranational judicial procedure, nor as resolving a debate over whether the ECtHR should strive for individual or constitutional justice, but rather as raising more fundamental questions concerning the Court's future identity. In particular, the article argues for recognition of ‘embeddedness’ in national legal systems as a deep structural principle of the ECHR, a principle that functions as a necessary counterpoint to the subsidiary doctrine that has animated the Convention since its founding. Embeddedness does not substitute ECtHR rulings for the decisions of national parliaments or domestic courts. Rather, it requires the Council of Europe and the Court to bolster the mechanisms for governments to remedy human rights violations at home, obviating the need for individuals to seek supranational relief and restoring countries to a position in which the ECtHR's deference to national decision-makers is appropriate.
机译：欧洲人权法院（ECtHR）是保护公民和政治自由的世界上最先进的国际体系的最高明珠。然而，近年来，欧洲人权法院已成为其自身成功的受害者。法院现在面临着巨大的诉讼危机，这是由于受其管辖的国家数量不断增加，其良好的公共声誉，对个人自由的广泛解释，某些国家对国内司法机构的不信任以及根深蒂固的人权问题所致在其他人。为了应对不断增加的个人投诉积压，欧洲委员会在过去五年中考虑了许多有关重组欧洲人权制度和重新设计《欧洲人权公约》的建议。本文认为，这些建议不应被理解为超国家司法程序中的部长级变更，也不应被理解为解决关于欧洲共同体人权法院是否应争取个人或宪法正义的辩论，而应被视为提出有关法院未来身份的更基本的问题。尤其是，该文章主张承认国家法律体系中的“嵌入性”是ECHR的深层结构性原则，该原则可作为自公约成立以来一直为之振奋的附属学说的必要对立物。嵌入性不能用ECtHR的裁决代替国家议会或国内法院的裁决。相反，它要求欧洲委员会和法院加强政府纠正国内侵犯人权行为的机制，从而避免了个人寻求超国家救济并将国家恢复到欧洲人权法院尊重国家决策者的立场。是适当的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号