• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European Sociological Review >Welfare States, Labour Market Institutions and the Working Poor: A Comparative Analysis of 20 European Countries
【24h】

Welfare States, Labour Market Institutions and the Working Poor: A Comparative Analysis of 20 European Countries

机译：福利国家，劳动力市场制度与工作贫困者：20个欧洲国家的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article regards the incidence of in-work poverty and how it is reduced by the payment of social transfers in 20 European countries. It combines a micro- and a macro-level perspective in two-level models. The basis for the analysis is micro-data from the EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) 2005 and macro-data from sources such as the OECD and Eurostat. The broad comparative perspective allows for a separation of different institutional influences, namely the influence of the degree of decommodification, defamilization, and bargaining centralization. In contrast to previous studies on the working poor which have mainly described country differences in in-work poverty, this article focuses on the question of how such differences can be explained from a broader perspective of poverty research. In general, the results confirm the overall hypothesis that both welfare state measures and labour market institutions have an influence on in-work poverty. By analysing influences on pre-transfer poverty and poverty reduction separately, the author shows that such factors have varied effects on in-work poverty. While bargaining centralization proves to be relevant for the distribution of pre-transfer incomes only, the set-up of the social security system, in particular, impacts the extent of poverty reduction.
机译：本文讨论了在欧洲20个国家中在职贫困的发生率以及如何通过支付社会转移来减少贫困。它在两个级别的模型中结合了微观和宏观的观点。分析的基础是来自《欧盟收入和生活状况统计》（EU-SILC）2005的微观数据以及来自OECD和Eurostat等来源的宏观数据。广泛的比较观点允许分离不同的制度影响，即去商品化程度，去污化程度和讨价还价集中化的影响。与先前关于在职穷人的研究相反，该研究主要描述了在职贫困中的国家差异，本文关注的问题是如何从更广泛的贫困研究角度来解释这种差异。总的来说，这些结果证实了总体假设，即福利国家措施和劳动力市场制度都对在职贫困产生影响。通过分别分析对转移前贫困和减贫的影响，作者表明这些因素对在职贫困的影响各不相同。虽然讨价还价集中化仅证明与转移前收入的分配有关，但社会保障体系的建立尤其会影响减贫的程度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European Sociological Review》 |2009年第4期|p.489-504|共16页
  • 作者

    Henning Lohmann;

  • 作者单位

    Henning Lohmann, German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), German Institute for Economic Research, DIW Berlin, 10108 Berlin, Germany. Email: hlohmann{at}diw.de;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号