首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation and program planning >Transforming a municipal school sports programme through a critical communicative methodology: The role of the of advisory committee
【24h】

Transforming a municipal school sports programme through a critical communicative methodology: The role of the of advisory committee

机译:通过关键的交流方法改变市政学校的体育计划:咨询委员会的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research applies a communicative methodology (CM) to the transformation and improvement of the Municipal Comprehensive School Sports Programme in Segovia, Spain (MCSSP), using egalitarian dialogue, based on validity rather than power claims to achieve intersubjectivity and arrive at consensus between all of the Programme's stakeholders through the intervention of an advisory committee (AC). The AC is a body comprising representatives of all stakeholder groups involved in the programme. During the 2013-2014 academic year the programme's AC met four times, operating as a communicative focus group (CFG). The meetings focused on: (1) excluding dimensions (barriers preventing transformation) and transforming dimensions (ways of overcoming barriers), (2) the programme's strengths, (3) the programme's weaknesses and specific actions to remedy them, and (4) the resulting conclusions which were then incorporated into the subsequent programme contract signed between the University and the Segovia Local Authority for 2014-2018. The key conclusions were: (1) the recommendations of the AC widen the range of perspectives and help the research team to make key decisions and (2) the use of CM to fully evaluate the programme and to reach a consensus on how to improve it proved very valuable. (C) 2016 Elsevier. Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究采用沟通方法论(CMSSP),通过平等对话,基于有效性而非权力主张,实现了主体间性并达成了所有主体之间的共识,并运用平等对话来对西班牙塞哥维亚市政综合学校体育计划(MCSSP)进行转型和改进。通过咨询委员会的干预,使计划的利益相关者受益。 AC是一个由参与该计划的所有利益相关者团体的代表组成的机构。在2013-2014学年期间,该计划的咨询委员会以沟通焦点小组(CFG)的身份举行了四次会议。会议的重点是:(1)排除规模(防止转型的障碍)和转型维度(克服障碍的方式),(2)计划的优势,(3)计划的劣势和纠正这些劣势的具体行动,以及(4)得出的结论随后被纳入大学与塞哥维亚地方当局之间2014-2018年签署的后续计划合同中。关键结论是:(1)AC的建议拓宽了视野,并帮助研究团队做出了关键决定;(2)使用CM来全面评估该计划并就如何改进该计划达成共识被证明是非常有价值的。 (C)2016爱思唯尔。有限公司。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号