CSIRO's WLAN patent claim highly disputable

首页> 外文期刊>Exchange >CSIRO's WLAN patent claim highly disputable

【24h】

CSIRO's WLAN patent claim highly disputable

机译：CSIRO的WLAN专利声称争议很大

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The combined might of some of the world's largest IT manufacturers Is lining against the CSIRO in a challenge to Its claims for licence fees on a patent which It says key to the IEEE 802.11a/g WLAN technologies, but this claim appears highly questionable. The CSIRO has announced that "some of the world's most significant suppliers of wireless LAN devices" have initiated legal action in the US to try to stop it obtaining what it says are "reasonable royalties" for the patent It said that these companies include "Microsoft, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Apple and Netgear," and that it had "offered licenses on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms to major suppliers as soon as they started selling devices which used the CSIRO technology." In February CSIRO says it "began legal action in the US against Buffalo Technology, a Japanese owned company, which had unilaterally terminated negotiations with CSIRO in relation to a license."

机译：一些世界上最大的IT制造商的综合实力正在与CSIRO对抗，以挑战其关于专利许可费的索赔，该专利说这是IEEE 802.11a / g / n WLAN技术的关键，但是这种说法似乎值得怀疑。。 CSIRO宣布，“一些世界上最重要的无线LAN设备供应商”已在美国提起法律诉讼，以阻止其获得该专利的“合理特许权使用费”。该公司表示，这些公司包括“微软，戴尔，惠普，英特尔，苹果和Netgear”，并表示“一旦主要供应商开始销售使用CSIRO技术的设备，便以合理且无歧视的方式向他们提供了许可”。 CSIRO在2月份表示，“已在美国针对一家日本独资公司Buffalo Technology提起法律诉讼，该公司单方面终止了与CSIRO的许可证谈判。”

著录项

来源
《Exchange》 |2005年第19期|p.2-3|共2页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类无线电电子学、电信技术;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Fujitsu settles with CSIRO over WLAN patent [J] . Exchange . 2009,第13期

机译：富士通通过CSIRO解决WLAN专利问题
2. Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination of Claims in Patent Applications; Final Rule [J] . Biotechnology Law Report . 2007,第6期

机译：对连续审查申请，包含明显含糊的权利要求的专利申请以及专利申请中的权利要求进行审查的做法的变更;最终规则
3. ACCEPTANCE OF AMBIGUOUS PATENT CLAIMS AS DEFEATING STATUTORY REQUIREMENT OF PARTICULAR AND DISTINCT PATENT CLAIMS [J] . Intellectual property counselor . 2014,第206期

机译：接受模糊专利申请作为对特定和不同专利申请的法定要求的不实行为
4. WHAT EVERY PLASTICS PROFESSIONAL SHOULD KNOW ABOUT PATENTS AND PATENTING PART 1: AN OVERVIEW OF PATENTS AND THE ROLE OF CLAIMS IN DEFINING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS GRANTED IN UTILITY PATENTS [C] . Amad Tayebi Society of Plastics Engineers Annual Technical Conference 2005(ANTEC 2005) vol.9; 20050501-05; Boston,MA(US) . 2005

机译：每种塑料专业人士都应该了解专利和专利的内容：第1部分：专利概述和索赔在定义实用专利中授予的知识产权中的作用
5. Comparative Study on Patent Claim Interpretation: the United States and China. [D] . Peng, Zhe. 2012

机译：专利权利要求解释的比较研究：美国和中国。
6. Gene and genetic diagnostic method patent claims: a comparison under current European and US patent law [O] . Isabelle Huys, Geertrui Van Overwalle, Gert Matthijs 2011

机译：基因和遗传诊断方法专利权利要求：根据当前的欧洲和美国专利法进行比较
7. British Letters Patent of 1908 and 1917 constituting the Falkland Islands Dependencies The following are the texts of the two Letters Patent denning the boundaries of the Falkland Islands Dependencies. They are reprinted here in view of the current political interest in this area. Some confusion has arisen owing to misrepresentation of the wording of these documents. The Letters Patent of 1908 made provision for the government of certain specified land areas lying between specified latitudes and longitudes. No claim was made to jurisdiction over the High Seas within these boundaries; still less was any claim made to that part of South America which lies to the south of latitude 50° S. The Letters Patent of 1917 denned the area more precisely in order to avoid this ambiguity. All subsequent British legislation for the administration of these Dependencies is based on the authority of these two documents. [O] . 1948

机译：英国信件1908年和1917年构成福克兰群岛的依赖性以下是谴责福克兰群岛依赖性的边界的两封信的文本。鉴于目前对该领域的政治兴趣，他们在此转载。由于这些文件的措辞歪曲了一些混乱。 1908年的信件专利为某些指定土地区域的政府提供了符合特定纬度和纵向的政府。在这些界限内没有索赔对公海的司法管辖区;仍然仍然是对南美洲的那部分索利的任何索赔，这些南美侧向纬度为50°S南部。1917年的字母专利更准确地击落了该地区，以避免这种歧义。所有后续英国人的管理这些依赖项的立法是基于这两份文件的权威。
8. Chasing the Dark, Perspectives on Place, History and Alaska Native Land Claims, Shadowlands, Vol. 1, January 2009 [R] . 2009

机译：追逐黑暗，观点地方，历史和阿拉斯加原住民土地索赔，shadowlands，Vol。 1，2009年1月

CSIRO's WLAN patent claim highly disputable

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅