...
【24h】

Who polices the policemen?

机译:谁负责警察?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The sentencing of ex-US Coast Guard chief warrant officer David Williams for lying about an oily water separator bypass aboard the cutter Rush (p10) certainly raises questions. How can shipping be assured this was a onetime crime, since the USCG itself polices OWS compliance? Why wasn't the USCG charged with violating the ships pollution act? Why were no higher-ups charged? How did Williams get off with just 200 hours of community service? We posed these questions to USCG headquarters, which revealed that a working group tc evaluate its vessel environmental programme found "opportunities for improvement". Changes are being implemented. The agency further conceded that it faces the same challenges as commercial shipping when operating OWS systems, but newer cutters will employ newer technology. In addition, the Coast Guard noted that it is exempt from punitive liability under the clean water and pollution prevention acts, but strives to comply with those standards.
机译:美国前海岸警卫队首席准尉大卫·威廉姆斯(David Williams)因在切割机Rush(p10)上绕过油分水器而被判刑,这无疑引起了人们的质疑。由于USCG本身负责监管OWS,因此如何确保这是一次犯罪? USCG为什么不指控违反船舶污染法案?为什么没有收取更高费用?威廉姆斯是如何通过200个小时的社区服务而下车的?我们向美国海岸警卫队总部提出了这些问题,该总部透露,一个评估其船舶环境计划的工作小组发现了“改进的机会”。正在实施更改。该机构进一步承认,在使用OWS系统时,它面临与商业运输相同的挑战,但是新型切割机将采用新型技术。此外,海岸警卫队指出,根据《清洁水和污染预防法》,它免于承担惩罚性责任,但努力遵守这些标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号