...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Fairplay International Shipping Weekly >When a charterer is not an owner
【24h】

When a charterer is not an owner

机译：如果租船人不是船东

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A charterer is only entitled to limit his liability for damage if he was acting as 'owner' when it occurred, a London Commercial judge has ruled. When the owner of CMA Djakarta sued the charterer, CMA CGM, for damage to the vessel and cargo during the charter period, CMA CGM could not limit its liability for damages under the 1976 Limitation Convention. The issues were whether a time charterer comes within the category of 'ship owner' for the purposes of the 1976 international Limitation Convention for limiting liability for marine claims. Even if so, was the charterer entitled to limit its liability against a claim by the actual owner for damage to the ship and cargo on the chartered voyage? The Commercial Court was asked to decide these questions on appeal from an arbitration award of damages and indemnification in favour of the owner of the CMA Djakarta.
机译：伦敦商事法官裁定，如果承租人在其作为“所有人”时发生损害，则仅有权限制其损害赔偿责任。当达飞船公司的所有人在租船期间起诉承租人达飞船公司对船舶和货物的损害时，达飞船公司无法根据1976年《时效公约》限制其损害赔偿责任。问题是，就1976年国际限制海事公约而言，定期租船人是否属于“船东”类别，以限制海事索赔的责任。即使是这样，承租人是否有权将责任限制为实际所有人对包租航程中的船舶和货物造成损害的索赔？要求商事法庭就损害赔偿和赔偿金的仲裁裁决提出上诉，以CMA Djakarta的所有人为受益人来决定这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号