首页> 外文期刊>Faravid >Kalmistoja, kaivauksia, kallonmittausta. Fyysisen antropologian tutkimuskohteita Pohjois-Suomessa
【24h】

Kalmistoja, kaivauksia, kallonmittausta. Fyysisen antropologian tutkimuskohteita Pohjois-Suomessa

机译:墓地,发掘,头骨测量。芬兰北部的自然人类学研究主题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Helsingin yliopiston anatomian laitoksen kokoelmiin talletetut saamelaiskallot saivat Metsähallituksen 1990-luvulla teettämän selvityksen myötä laajaa julkisuutta. Arkeologi Aki Arposen laatimasta raportista kävi nimittäin ilmi, että antropologisiin tutkimuksiin liittyviä kaivauksia oli tehty ainakin Inarijärven Vanhassa Hautuumaa-saaressa, ehkä myös muillakin pohjoisen vanhoilla hautausmailla. Tutkimuksesta tuli lisäksi julki, että Helsingin yliopistolla oli pääasiassa 1800-luvulla ja 1900-luvun alussa kerättyyn anatomiseen kokoelmaan liitettynä ainakin Inarista, Utsjoelta ja Muoniosta koottua historiallista luuaineistoa.%In the heyday of physical anthropology, researchers were interested in historical cemeteries in Lapland during two different periods. During the first period, the 19~(th) century, cemeteries were mainly excavated in connection with a project organised by foreign researchers and the director of the Department of Anatomy at the University of Helsinki, Mr. Konrad Hällsten. The second period of interest spanned the 1930s, when the Anthropological Committee of the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters organised a wide-ranging programme resulting in extensive investigations, and finally, also in excavations at the cemetery of Vanha Hautuumaasaari island in Inari. Both waves of research can be regarded as part of a larger research tradition in anthropology. In the 19~(th) century, for instance, researchers focused on craniometrical data, while in the beginning of the following century, other bone material was also collected for analysis. The incentives for both of these waves of research came from abroad; however, the Department of Anatomy at the University of Helsinki and Finnish researchers played a pivotal role in them as well. Ultimately, the research projects were national endeavours, although the data on the Sami people were of interest to researchers all over the world. Similar physical anthropology data were collected all over Finland during the same period. However, the geographical focus of this paper is on Lapland. Even if the excavations in the North were not a separate phenomenon in physical anthropology, researchers had certain special emphases and detailed research questions particularly regarding the Sami people. Data on the cemeteries excavated in Lapland for anthropological purposes have not been compiled before, and only some of the excavated locations have been precisely known to researchers. By combining various sources it has been possible to obtain a more reliable picture of the number, location, and nature of the examined research sites and the actual investigations carried out there. From the late 19~(th) century until the 1930s, over 300 craniums classified as Lappish (Sami) were collected at different cemeteries in Finnish Lapland. The figure excludes craniums gathered by foreign researchers. Collecting ancient bone material proved to be more challenging than researchers had anticipated, and far fewer sites were excavated than was originally planned. Furthermore, research was purely anthropological: researchers merely collected bone material and paid no attention to the details of the graves. There are therefore no scientific records on the depth, direction, or structure of the graves or the finds in them. Cooperation with archaeologists began as late as the 1930s, and even then it was not systematic. Some of the excavations were conducted on ecclesiastical sites, such as churchyards and graveyards, and some at local cemeteries. Excavated graves were dated to the 18~(th) century, mainly by methods of settlement history. The collected material, however, is ethnically not as Sami as was originally assumed. The anthropological measurement data from different projects in Lapland were, nevertheless, widely used in publications on medicine and human physiology, and the large amount of data acquired for theses was analysed and even published until the 1950s.
机译:1990年代,由Metsähallitus委托进行的一项研究,大量存放在赫尔辛基大学解剖学系收藏物中的Sámi头骨受到了广泛宣传。考古学家阿基·阿波宁(Aki Arponen)编写的报告显示,与人类学研究有关的发掘至少在伊纳里湖的老公墓岛上进行了,也许也在北部的其他老公墓中进行了。这项研究还显示,赫尔辛基大学至少有从Inari,Utsjoki和Muonio收集的历史骨材料与主要在19世纪和20世纪初收集的解剖学样本相联系。不同时期。在19世纪(世纪)的第一阶段,主要是与外国研究人员和赫尔辛基大学解剖学系主任KonradHällsten先生组织的一个项目相关的发掘了墓地。第二个兴趣期跨度为1930年代,当时芬兰科学与文学研究院的人类学委员会组织了范围广泛的计划,进行了广泛的调查,最后还在伊纳里(Inari)的旧Hautuumaasaari岛公墓进行了发掘。两种研究浪潮都可以看作是人类学更大研究传统的一部分。例如,在19世纪之前,研究人员专注于颅骨测量数据,而在下个世纪初,还收集了其他骨骼材料进行分析。这两种研究浪潮的动力都来自国外。然而,赫尔辛基大学的解剖学系和芬兰研究人员在其中也发挥了关键作用。最终,尽管全世界各地的研究人员都对萨米人的数据感兴趣,但这些研究项目都是国家的努力。同期,芬兰各地收集了相似的自然人类学数据。但是,本文的地理重点是拉普兰。即使在北方人类的发掘并不是自然人类学中的单独现象,研究人员也有一些特别的重点和详细的研究问题,尤其是关于萨米人的问题。拉普兰出于人类学目的而挖掘的墓地的数据以前尚未收集,研究人员仅精确地了解了其中一些挖掘位置。通过组合各种来源,可以更可靠地了解被调查研究地点以及在那里进行的实际调查的数量,位置和性质。从19世纪末至1930年代,在芬兰拉普兰的各个公墓中收集了300多个分类为拉普兰(Sami)的颅骨。该数字不包括外国研究人员收集的头盖骨。事实证明,收集古代骨骼材料比研究人员所预期的更具挑战性,而且挖掘的地点远少于最初计划的地点。此外,研究纯粹是人类学的研究:研究人员仅收集骨骼材料,而没有关注Graves的细节。因此,没有关于格雷夫斯或其中发现的深度,方向或结构的科学记录。与考古学家的合作始于1930年代,但那时还不是系统的。一些发掘是在教堂现场和墓地等教堂现场进行的,还有一些是在当地公墓进行的。出土的格雷夫斯可追溯至18世纪,主要是通过定居史的方法。但是,所收集的材料在种族上并不像最初假定的那样萨米人。但是,来自拉普兰各个项目的人类学测量数据被广泛用于医学和人类生理学的出版物,并且对这些论文获得的大量数据进行了分析,甚至一直出版到1950年代。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Faravid》 |2012年第2012期|57-85|共29页
  • 作者

    Juha Ruohonen;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fin
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号