...
首页> 外文期刊>Fire and materials >Application of a judgement method to regulatory impact assessments for sprinkler protection to English high-rise residential buildings
【24h】

Application of a judgement method to regulatory impact assessments for sprinkler protection to English high-rise residential buildings

机译:判断方法在洒水隆起保护对英语高层住宅建筑的监管影响评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When proposing a widespread investment in a safety measure, it is common for some form of regulatory impact assessment to be undertaken. In this study, the cost-effectiveness of two proposals made by government bodies in England are investigated. The first is made by the London Assembly Planning Committee (LAPC) to retrofit London's existing high-rise residential buildings (HRRBs) with sprinkler systems. Similarly, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has called for evidence to support reducing the trigger height for sprinkler provision in new HRRBs. The redundant concept of a value for a preventable fatality is addressed using theJ-value methodology. The baseline results show aJ-value above unity for both proposals, suggesting that they are potentially not cost-effective. A sensitivity analysis highlights the embedded uncertainty and the implications for theJ-value. For the MHCLG proposal, a large increase in annual fatalities for HRRBs would be required to support a reduction in trigger height for the inclusion of sprinklers. However, reasonable modification of some inputs results in aJ-value below unity for the LAPC proposal, suggesting that this may be a cost-effective safety investment. It may be argued that this proposal be implemented to err on the side of caution.
机译:在提出安全措施中的广泛投资时,常常为某种形式的监管影响评估进行。在这项研究中,调查了英格兰政府机构提出的两项建议的成本效益。首先是由伦敦集会规划委员会(LAPC)制造,以通过喷水灭火系统改造伦敦现有的高层住宅建筑(HRRB)。同样,住房,社区和地方政府(MHCLG)呼吁支持减少新的HRRB中洒水康顿士人的触发高度。使用TheJ-Value方法解决了可预防的死亡价值的冗余概念。基线结果显示了两个建议的高于统一的AJ-Value,这表明它们可能没有成本效益。敏感性分析突出了嵌入式不确定性和对该价值的影响。对于MHCLG提案,需要对HRRB的年度死亡人数增加,支持减少扣留洒水器的触发高度。然而,对某些投入的合理修改会导致LAPC建议的AJ-Value低于统一,这表明这可能是一种经济有效的安全投资。可能有人认为,这一提议在谨慎方面实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号