首页> 外文期刊>Forbes >IS VANGUARD TO SUCCESSFUL?
【24h】

IS VANGUARD TO SUCCESSFUL?

机译:是成功的先锋吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It's a glorious time to be in the business of selling index funds, those robotically assembled portfolios that replicate a stock or bond market Active managers are having a hard time beating the indexes and a harder time persuading savers to let them try. Vanguard Group, the leading operator of index funds, is slurping up 57% of the dollars going into the fund industry. A victory for Vanguard and the man who built it, John C. Bogle. But... is it possible that indexing is being overdone? That provocative question is asked by James Grant in the pages of his small but influential investment newsletter, Grant's Interest Rate Observer. Investing theories run in cycles, he argues. A success becomes a fad and a fad becomes a failure. Smart people bet against fads.
机译:现在是卖掉指数基金,那些通过机械组装而成的,可以复制股票或债券市场的投资组合的光荣时期。活跃的经理们很难击败指数,也很难说服储户让他们尝试。领先的指数基金运营商先锋集团(Vanguard Group)吞噬了进入基金行业的57%的资金。 Vanguard及其制造者John C. Bogle的胜利。但是...索引编制是否有可能过度?詹姆斯·格兰特(James Grant)在他的小型但有影响力的投资通讯《格兰特的利率观察家》的页面上提出了这个挑衅性的问题。他认为,投资理论是周期性运行的。成功成为一种时尚,一种时尚成为失败。聪明的人反对时尚。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Forbes》 |2015年第2期|92-9496-97|共5页
  • 作者

    WILLIAM BALDWIN;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号