首页> 外文期刊>Forbes >RECESSIONS AND BEARS
【24h】

RECESSIONS AND BEARS

机译:疲劳与疲劳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

John kenneth galbraith once said, "economists predict not because they know but because they are asked." At the start of every year economists, analysts and commentators venture forth with their predictions. I ignore their pronouncements because they have little, if any, accountability. These pundits seldom have to explain why they were right or wrong. FORBES, however, does not let me off so lightly. By the magazine's accounting, my 2007 stock picks last year lost 1.1%; equal sums invested in the S&P 500 on the same dates would have left you with a 1.8% gain. (In this calculation my picks, but not the benchmark, are debited for a hypothetical 1% trading cost.) My best recommendation was Google, up 50%, followed by Apple, up 42%. The worst was New Century Financial; the subprime lender lost its entire value and now is in Chapter 11. Next worst was New York Times, down 33%.
机译:约翰·肯尼思·加尔布雷思(John Kenneth galbraith)曾说过:“经济学家预测不是因为他们知道,而是因为有人被问到了。”每年年初,经济学家,分析师和评论员都会大胆提出自己的预测。我无视他们的声明,因为他们几乎没有问责制。这些专家很少需要解释为什么是对还是错。但是,《福布斯》并没有让我那么轻松。根据该杂志的统计,去年我的2007年选股价格下跌了1.1%;如果您在相同的日期投资相等于标准普尔500指数,将为您带来1.8%的收益。 (在此计算中,我的选择权(而不是基准)被扣除了假设的1%的交易成本。)我最好的建议是Google,上涨50%,其次是Apple,上涨42%。最糟糕的是新世纪金融。次级贷方失去了全部价值,现在在第11章中。其次是《纽约时报》,下跌了33%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号