• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Forbes >A World Without the UN?
【24h】

A World Without the UN?

机译：没有联合国的世界吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

So fast! The first question that must be posed is whether a system of collective responsibility to pursue peace and security still makes equal sense for the strong and the weak countries of the world. I believe it does. The weak want to know that if they're threatened by another country the international community will not be indifferent. The powerful know that even if they had the resources to wage war successfully against any potential aggressor state, it would be better to spare those resources if their security and national interest could be indubitably protected by other means. They also know that today s security threats are very different from traditional intercountry conflicts. Terrorists and other transnational criminals, along with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, constitute perils that no country, irrespective of its economic or military might, can defeat alone. Cooperative and collective action is required. The next pertinent question is whether the nearly 60-year-old United Nations can be the institution to organize and deliver that collective action. I say it can be, as long as the institution is reformed and strengthened to perform its essential functions effectively. It would be a monumental mistake to condemn the UN to extinction, either by decision or neglect Eventually, but probably only after we'd endured a dramatic increase in violent conflict and its destructive consequences, it would become imperative to invent the UN anew.
机译：很快！必须提出的第一个问题是，追求和平与安全的集体责任制对于世界强国和弱国是否仍然具有同等意义。我相信是的。弱者想知道，如果他们受到另一个国家的威胁，国际社会将不会冷漠。强大的力量知道，即使他们有资源成功对付任何潜在的侵略国，但如果可以通过其他手段毫无疑问地保护它们的安全和国家利益，那就最好保留这些资源。他们还知道，当今的安全威胁与传统的国家间冲突大不相同。恐怖分子和其他跨国犯罪分子以及大规模毁灭性武器的扩散构成了任何国家，无论其经济或军事实力如何，都无法单独击败的危险。需要采取合作和集体行动。下一个有关的问题是，已有近60年历史的联合国是否可以成为组织和执行这一集体行动的机构。我说可以，只要改革和加强该机构以有效地履行其基本职能即可。最终通过决定或无视谴责联合国而灭绝将是一个巨大的错误，但也许只有在我们忍受暴力冲突及其破坏性后果急剧增加之后，重新发明联合国才势在必行。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Forbes》 |2005年第6期|p.41|共1页
  • 作者

    Ernesto Zedillo;

  • 作者单位

    Yale Center for the Study of Globalization;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界经济问题;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号