首页> 外文期刊>Forbes >Get Movin' on Trade—or Else!
【24h】

Get Movin' on Trade—or Else!

机译:让Movin参与贸易-否则!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The white house had better jump-start the doha round of trade talks. It must give the process a sense of urgency, just as it has finally done with the small but symbolically important Central American Free Trade Agreement (Cafta). Otherwise, for the first time since the Second World War, a major global trade initiative could falter, thereby giving antigrowth, politically destabilizing protectionist forces a lethal lease on life. Global trade negotiations are becoming a more laborious process, thanks to the scores of nations involved. But even so, this round has been particularly cumbersome because of strategic mistakes made by both developed and developing countries, particularly in the always-sensitive area of agriculture. Only recently, for instance, have negotiators come up with a complex formula for putting an economic value on the cost of particular agricultural tariffs. This technical, tedious piece of business should've been wrapped up a couple of years ago.
机译:白宫最好能启动多哈回合贸易谈判。它必须使该过程具有紧迫感,就像它最终达成的是规模很小但具有象征意义的中美洲自由贸易协定(Cafta)一样。否则,自第二次世界大战以来,一项重大的全球贸易倡议可能会动摇,从而给反增长,在政治上不稳定的贸易保护主义势力致命。由于涉及的国家众多,全球贸易谈判正变得更加艰巨。但是即使这样,由于发达国家和发展中国家都犯了战略性错误,特别是在对农业始终敏感的领域,这一轮特别麻烦。例如,直到最近,谈判者才提出一个复杂的公式,将特定农业关税的成本作为经济价值。这项技术繁琐的工作应该在几年前完成。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Forbes》 |2005年第2期|p.29-30|共2页
  • 作者

    Steve Forbes;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界经济问题;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号