首页> 外文期刊>Forbes >Silicon Valley's Future
【24h】

Silicon Valley's Future

机译:硅谷的未来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In his 1936 essay "the crack-up"novelist f. scott fitzgerald got off his famous observation about the test of a first-rate mind. Fitzgerald said an intelligent person should be capable of holding two opposing ideas in his head and still function. Fitzgerald never specified what he meant by this. Of course his quote endures because of its mysterious vagueness. Maybe Fitzgerald meant to say something grandly philosophical, such as: In order for mankind to survive, we must conduct our lives as if there were a God who would judge us for eternity, when the truth may be ... well, who knows. Possibly he was referring to the old paradox of our dual nature as human animals: part logical, part intuitive. Or maybe Fitzgerald merely was looking at his own unhappy life―and confessing how hard it is to pretend that one's work matters when one is beset by drunkenness and depression. Now, let's see if we can hold two opposing thoughts about Silicon Valley in our heads.
机译:在他的1936年的论文“打crack”小说家f中。斯科特·菲茨杰拉德(Scott Fitzgerald)摆脱了他关于一流思维考验的著名观察。菲茨杰拉德说,一个聪明的人应该能够在脑海中抱着两个相反的想法,并且仍然可以起作用。菲茨杰拉德从未明确说明他的意思。当然,由于其神秘的含糊性,他的报价能持久。也许菲茨杰拉德(Fitzgerald)的意思是说出一些哲理性的话,例如:为了使人类生存,我们必须进行生活,就好像有一位真主将审判我们永恒的上帝一样,……真相是……知道,知道。可能他将人类双重性的古老悖论称为人类动物:部分逻辑,部分直觉。也许菲茨杰拉德只是在看着自己不愉快的生活,并承认假装醉酒和沮丧困扰着一个人的工作是多么困难。现在,让我们看看是否可以将两个关于硅谷的对立想法牢记在心。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Forbes》 |2003年第13期|p.47|共1页
  • 作者

    Rich Karlgaard;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界经济问题;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号