• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Towards a Gramscian food regime analysis of India's agrarian crisis: Counter-movements, petrofarming and Cheap Nature
【24h】

Towards a Gramscian food regime analysis of India's agrarian crisis: Counter-movements, petrofarming and Cheap Nature

机译：迈向对印度农业危机的葛兰西斯粮食制度分析：反运动，石油耕种和廉价自然

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article develops an initial framework for a Gramscian and political ecological food regime analysis of India's ongoing agrarian crisis. Criticizing readings of Polanyi in food regime analysis in light of Gramscian perspectives, I seek to contest food regime analysis's approach to counter-movements. I suggest, further, that close attention to the Indian case of 'actually existing crises' helps us avoid some of the capital-centric limitations in food regime literature. Working towards an incipient understanding of the absence of a sustained smallholder countermovement at the current conjuncture in India, I argue for locating our investigation at the intersection of crises of accumulation and of legitimation. I analyze India's decentralized form of petrofarming as a socioecological cycle of accumulation that is presently facing a condition of exhaustion of Cheap Nature. Drawing on Gramscian perespectives, I argue that an analytics that foregrounds the dynamics of class forces in the integral state can help us rethinking the possibilities for resistance to the contemporary food regime more broadly.
机译：本文开发了一个初步框架，用于对印度持续的农业危机进行葛兰西和政治生态食品制度分析。根据葛兰西的观点，对波兰尼在食品制度分析中的批评进行了批评，我试图对食品制度分析的反动方法提出质疑。我进一步建议，密切关注印度“实际存在的危机”案例有助于我们避免粮食制度文献中以资本为中心的某些局限性。为了使人们对印度在当前形势下缺乏持续的小农户反动产生一个初步的了解，我主张将我们的调查定位在积累危机和合法化危机的交集上。我将印度的石油耕作的分散形式分析为一种社会生态学的累积循环，目前正面临着廉价自然枯竭的状况。借助葛兰西的观点，我认为，以阶级状态在整体状态下的动态为基础的分析可以帮助我们从更广泛的角度重新考虑抵抗现代粮食制度的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号