• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Higher education mobilities: a cross-national European comparison
【24h】

Higher education mobilities: a cross-national European comparison

机译：高等教育流动性：欧洲跨国比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Within the extant literature on patterns of mobility of European higher education students there is some recognition that these differ across geographical space - in relation to variations in national uptake of the European Union's Erasmus scheme, for example. However, strong similarities are also often identified - about the way in which mobility is desired by students, higher education institutions and national governments, and how this is stimulated, in part, by various European initiatives such as the commitment to forging a European Higher Education Area. Moreover, while scholars have critiqued normative expectations of mobility - pointing out, for example, that not all students have the necessary social, cultural and economic resources to support a period of study abroad - there has been less critical focus on the way in which constructions of the 'mobile student' vary spatially. This article draws on a dataset of 92 policy documents from six European nations to argue that, while some convergence is notable, particularly in relation to the ways in which student mobility is placed centre-stage within internationalisation strategies, key differences are also evident - with respect to: the scale of desired mobility; the characteristics of the imagined 'mobile subject'; the extent to which social justice concerns are brought into play; and the prioritisation given to outward mobility. These raise important questions about the degree of 'policy convergence' across Europe and the ostensible homogenisation of European higher education systems around an Anglo-American model.
机译：在有关欧洲高等教育学生的流动方式的现有文献中，人们已经认识到，这些差异在地理空间上是不同的，例如，与各国对欧盟伊拉斯mus计划的采用情况有关。但是，人们也经常发现强烈的相似之处-关于学生，高等教育机构和国家政府期望流动性的方式，以及部分地通过各种欧洲举措（例如致力于打造欧洲高等教育）来刺激这种流动区域。此外，虽然学者们对流动性的规范期望提出了批评，例如指出并非所有学生都有必要的社会，文化和经济资源来支持出国留学，但对建筑的方式的关注却较少。的“流动学生”在空间上有所不同。本文借鉴了来自六个欧洲国家的92个政策文件的数据集，他们指出，尽管有一些显着的融合，尤其是在国际化战略中将学生流动性置于中心位置的方式方面，但也存在明显的差异-关于：期望流动的规模；想象中的“移动主题”的特征；社会正义问题在多大程度上发挥作用；并优先考虑外向流动性。这些问题引发了关于整个欧洲“政策融合”的程度以及围绕英美模式的欧洲高等教育体系表面上的同质化的重要问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号