• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Bridging good food and good jobs: From secession to confrontation within alternative food movement politics
【24h】

Bridging good food and good jobs: From secession to confrontation within alternative food movement politics

机译：桥接好食物和好工作：从分裂运动到替代性食物运动政治中的对抗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Much of the alternative food movement is predicated on a prefigurative politics of building alternatives to the conventional agrifood system, with only a smaller segment invested in a politics of confrontation with that very same system. In the context of actually existing agrifood relations, this raises a number of concerns. First, the movement often ignores challenging race and class inequality within the agrifood system in favor of realizing environmental sustainability and supporting small farmers. Second, corporate agribusinesses often co-opt the movement's consumer-centric and health-centric framings to legitimate low-wage big-box retail development in low-income urban communities. Third, the movement does not always recognize how low-income urban communities are developing language and tactics to shape local economic development. In this article, we investigate new alliances between alternative food organizations and labor organizations that use confrontational politics to demand greater food justice and economic justice in the conventional agrifood system. Specifically, we focus on struggles against Wal-Mart in New York City and Los Angeles and the discourse of "Good Food, Good Jobs," which is used to build alliances between alternative food activists and labor activists working to address the root causes of food insecurity and food deserts. We find that at the core of the Good Food, Good Jobs discourse is a politics committed to increasing the power and health of food chain workers, and more broadly, the communities within which they live, by rejecting the tradeoff between food and jobs, which empowers working class people to shape the development of their communities. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：替代性食品运动的大部分是基于比喻性的政治，即建立传统农业食品体系的替代品，只有一小部分人投资于与同一系统对抗的政治。在实际存在的农业食品关系的背景下，这引起了许多关注。首先，该运动常常忽略了农业食品系统中具有挑战性的种族和阶级不平等，而主张实现环境的可持续性并支持小农。其次，公司农业综合企业通常将运动的以消费者为中心和以健康为中心的框架选择为低收入城市社区中合法的低薪大盒子零售发展。第三，运动并不总是意识到低收入的城市社区如何发展语言和策略来塑造当地的经济发展。在本文中，我们研究了替代食品组织和劳工组织之间的新联盟，这些联盟使用对抗性政治来要求常规农业食品系统中更大的食品正义和经济正义。具体来说，我们专注于在纽约市和洛杉矶与沃尔玛（Wal-Mart）进行的斗争以及“好食物，好工作”的论述，该论述用于在替代食品激进主义者和致力于解决食品根本原因的劳工激进主义者之间建立联盟动荡和粮食荒漠。我们发现，以良好食物为核心的“良好工作”话语是一种政治，致力于通过拒绝食物与工作之间的权衡来提高食物链工人以及更广泛的他们所居住的社区的力量和健康。使工人阶级的人能够塑造其社区的发展。 （C）2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号