...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Geografiska Annaler. B, Human Geography >NORDEN AND THE 'SUBSTANTIVE LANDSCAPE': A PERSONAL ACCOUNT
【24h】

NORDEN AND THE 'SUBSTANTIVE LANDSCAPE': A PERSONAL ACCOUNT

机译：诺顿和“实质性景观”：个人帐户

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This commentary takes its point of departure in the debate provoked by the landscape theory that Denis Cosgrove presented in his seminal book, Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape (1984), in which he defined landscape in terms of scenic, spatial forms of representation. By unpacking the evolution of the concept of landscape the author proposed an alternative interpretation to Cosgrove's, emphasizing differing conceptions of lawfulness, in which the "substantive" platial landscape was introduced as a counterpoint to the scenic spatial concept. Initially, and for two particular reasons, the substantive landscape became theoretically placed in Norden: first, due to the historical and contemporary territorial/platial connotations of the term in the Nordic realm, and second, because the interest in a substantive landscape has been considerable among Nordic scholars. Today, this interest goes well beyond a Nordic context. In commenting on the contributions in this special issue the paper points at how different engagements with a "substantive landscape" might inform present and future scholarly debate concerning the role and meaning of landscape.
机译：丹尼斯·科斯格罗夫（Denis Cosgrove）在他的开创性著作《社会形成与象征性景观》（Social Forming and Symbolic Landscape）（1984）中提出的景观理论引发了辩论，这一评论从辩论的出发点出发。在该书中，他根据景观的空间表示形式定义了景观。通过解开景观概念的演变，作者提出了对Cosgrove的另一种解释，强调了不同的合法性概念，其中引入了“实质性”的平板景观作为对风景空间概念的对立。最初，由于两个特定的原因，实体景观在理论上被放置在Norden中：首先，由于该术语在北欧领域中的历史和当代领土/崇尚含义，其次，由于对实体景观的兴趣很大在北欧学者中。今天，这种兴趣已经远远超出了北欧语境。在评论本期特刊中的文章时，论文指出了与“实质性景观”的不同接触如何可以为当前和未来有关景观的作用和意义的学术辩论提供信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号