• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Global economic review >Neo-liberal Korea and Still Developmentalist Japan: Myth or Reality?
【24h】

Neo-liberal Korea and Still Developmentalist Japan: Myth or Reality?

机译：新自由主义朝鲜和仍然是发展主义者的日本：神话还是现实？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the "varieties of capitalism" debate, scholars have paid considerable attention to the question of whether Korea and Japan have left behind their interventionist political economy for neo-liberal reform. In this paper, we re-examine the scholarly consensus that Korea has become a neo-liberal state, while Japan has not changed much. On the basis of our comparison of the extent of the two countries' neo-liberal reforms using the "business systems framework" developed by Witt, we demonstrate that neo-liberal reforms observed in Korea and Japan are not substantially different enough to warrant the view that the two countries have taken divergent paths of institutional development. With this finding, we call for further empirical study, including the development and use of more qualitative data. We suggest that the future direction research should take on this issue in order to make theoretical contributions to the existing literature on institutional change and continuity in "non-liberal" capitalist countries. We do this by offering some methods in which future researchers could identify necessary and sufficient causes of Korea's and Japan's neo-liberal (or non-neo-liberal) shift.
机译：在“各种资本主义”辩论中，学者们对韩日是否为新自由主义改革留下了干预主义政治经济学的问题给予了极大的关注。在本文中，我们重新审视了学术共识，即韩国已成为新自由主义国家，而日本并没有太大改变。根据我们使用维特（Witt）开发的“业务系统框架”对两国的新自由主义改革程度进行比较的基础上，我们证明，韩国和日本观察到的新自由主义改革在本质上并没有太大差异，足以证明这一观点。两国采取了不同的体制发展道路。有了这一发现，我们呼吁进行进一步的实证研究，包括开发和使用更多定性数据。我们建议，未来的方向研究应该针对这个问题，以便为有关“非自由”资本主义国家的制度变迁和连续性的现有文献做出理论上的贡献。为此，我们提供了一些方法，使未来的研究人员可以找出导致韩国和日本的新自由主义（或非新自由主义）转变的必要和充分原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号