...
首页> 外文期刊>Globalizations >Polanyi's two transformations revisited: a 'bottom up' perspective
【24h】

Polanyi's two transformations revisited: a 'bottom up' perspective

机译:重新讨论了波兰尼的两个转变:“自下而上”的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In The Great Transformation, Karl Polanyi offers a 'top-down' analysis of the rise and demise of Europe's unregulated market system. He assumes that changes in the organization of the international economy provide particular kinds of opportunities for states to act which, in turn, shapes the extent to which social forces will be able to influence state policy. Consequently, his analysis focuses, first, on the international institutions created by the self-regulating market system; then on the 'liberal state' which these made possible; and finally on how the system impacts 'society as a whole'. The account which this analysis produces systematically underplays the social struggles which propelled and emerged from the rise of Europe's nineteenth century system and which ultimately led to its demise. In revisiting the two periods that are the focus of Polanyi's analysis, this article assumes that states and interstate systems reflect the interests of powerful social forces. Thus, working from the 'bottom up', it focuses on the class interests that produced Europe's market system, the state and international structures which reflected and supported them, and the social struggles that ultimately brought about the collapse of the system. What this 'bottom up' account reveals is the centrality of a 'double movement', not of market expansion and a protective countermove on the part of 'society as a whole', but of dominant classes monopolizing economic opportunities from global expansion, and a rising 'red tide' of disaffected workers. This double movement, it argues, better explains the demise of the system and the changes that ensued from it.
机译:在《大转型》中,卡尔·波兰尼(Karl Polanyi)对欧洲不受管制的市场体系的兴衰进行了“自上而下”的分析。他认为,国际经济组织的变化为国家采取行动提供了特殊的机会,而这些机会反过来又决定了社会力量能够影响国家政策的程度。因此,他的分析首先关注于由自我调节的市场体系创建的国际机构。然后在“自由状态”上使之成为可能;最后是该系统如何影响“整个社会”。这种分析所产生的解释系统地掩盖了自19世纪欧洲制度的兴起而产生并最终导致其灭亡的社会斗争。在回顾波兰尼分析的两个时期时,本文假设州和州际体系反映了强大的社会力量的利益。因此,从“自下而上”的工作出发,它关注产生欧洲市场体系的阶级利益,反映和支持它们的国家和国际结构,以及最终导致体系崩溃的社会斗争。这种“自下而上”的解释所揭示的是“双重运动”的中心性,而不是市场扩张和“整个社会”方面的保护性反动,而是统治阶级从全球扩张中垄断了经济机会,并且不满的工人正在上升的“赤潮”。它认为,这种双重运动更好地解释了系统的消亡以及随之而来的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号