Judges skeptical of EPA 'surrogate' claims in toxics rule

Amanda Reilly

首页> 外文期刊>Greenwire >Judges skeptical of EPA 'surrogate' claims in toxics rule

【24h】

Judges skeptical of EPA 'surrogate' claims in toxics rule

机译：法官对有毒物质规则中的EPA“替代”主张表示怀疑

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

A panel of federal judges today appeared skeptical of U.S. EPA's argument that a challenge byrnenvironmentalists to a 2015 hazardous air pollution rule is untimely.rnThe lawsuit by environmentalists claims that EPA illegally used limits on "surrogate" emissionsrnto regulate three hazardous air pollutants. They've asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for thernDistrict of Columbia Circuit to find that EPA has not complied with Clean Air Act requirements tornset standards for the pollutants.

机译：联邦法官小组今天对美国EPA的论点表示怀疑，该论点是环境主义者对2015年有害空气污染规则提出的挑战是不合时宜的。环境保护主义者的诉讼声称，EPA非法使用了“替代”排放限值来管制三种有害空气污染物。他们已要求美国联邦哥伦比亚巡回法院上诉法院裁定，EPA没有遵守《清洁空气法》的要求，撕毁了污染物的标准。

著录项

来源
《Greenwire》 |2017年第10期|1-4|共4页
作者
Amanda Reilly;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. 4th Circuit Judges Skeptical Of Ruling Forcing EPA Air Rules 'Jobs' Review [J] . David LaRoss Inside EPA's environmental policy alert . 2017,第11期

机译：第四巡回法院法官对裁定持怀疑态度EPA空气规则“工作”审查
2. D.C. Circuit judges skeptical of EPA's handling of rule [J] . Sean Reilly Greenwire . 2017,第NOVa21期

机译：华盛顿特区巡回法院对EPA处理规则表示怀疑
3. Skeptical judges question attack on EPA's proposed rule [J] . Jeremy P. Jacobs Greenwire . 2015,第APRa16期

机译：持怀疑态度的法官质疑对EPA拟议规则的攻击
4. A Novel Approach to Surrogate and Matrix Spiking Ambient Air Samples for EPA Methods TO-14A and TO-15 [C] . Gina M. Maio, Bryce E. Stearns International symposium on the measurement of toxic and related air pollutants . 2001

机译：用于EPA方法的替代和基质掺入环境空气样本的新方法 - 14A和15
5. Environmental risk choices: An empirical analysis of EPA's pesticide rules [D] . Bhattacharyya, Aparajita 2004

机译：环境风险选择：EPA农药法规的实证分析
6. College cannot be sued over negligence claim judge rules [O] . Amy-Jo Ehman 2001

机译：法官裁定大学不能因过失主张而被起诉
7. Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to eicosapentanoic acid (EPA) and “reduces the AA/EPA ratio in blood. A high AA/EPA level is a risk factor in the development of attention difficulties in children with ADHD-like symptoms” pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 [O] . EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) 2013

机译：关于证实与二十碳五烯酸（EPA）有关的健康声明的科学意见，并“降低了血液中的AA / EPA比值。根据1924/2006号法规（EC）第14条，较高的AA / EPA水平是导致多动症样症状儿童注意困难发展的危险因素

Judges skeptical of EPA 'surrogate' claims in toxics rule

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅