...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Policy and Planning >Dilemmas of securitization and health risk management in the People’s Republic of China: the cases of SARS and avian influenza
【24h】

Dilemmas of securitization and health risk management in the People’s Republic of China: the cases of SARS and avian influenza

机译:中华人民共和国的证券化和健康风险管理难题:SARS和禽流感病例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the SARS epidemic in 2003, the international community has urged Chinese leaders to do more to address infectious diseases. This paper looks at two cases in which the Chinese government securitized infectious disease (SARS and avian influenza) and examines the pros and cons of securitization. It is argued that the reactive mobilization involved in a securitizing move runs counter to the preventive risk management strategy needed to address infectious diseases. Although the Copenhagen School favours desecuritization as a return to normal practices, in the Chinese cases desecuritizing moves proved detrimental, involving cover-ups and restrictions on activists pressing for greater information. The article begins by examining the contributions of the Copenhagen School and sociological theories of risk to conceptualizing the security challenges that pandemics pose. Although analysis of the cases of SARS and avian influenza gives credence to criticisms of this approach, securitization theory proves useful in outlining the different stages in China’s reaction to epidemics involving reactive mobilization and subsequent efforts to return to politics as usual.
机译:自2003年SARS流行以来,国际社会已敦促中国领导人为应对传染病做出更多努力。本文考察了中国政府对两种传染病(SARS和禽流感)进行证券化的案例,并考察了证券化的利弊。有人认为,证券化行动中涉及的被动动员与解决传染病所需的预防风险管理策略背道而驰。尽管哥本哈根学派主张将去证券化作为恢复常规做法的手段,但在中国案例中,去证券化的举动被证明是有害的,包括掩盖和限制激进主义者寻求更多信息。本文首先探讨哥本哈根学派和风险社会学理论对概念化流行病带来的安全挑战的贡献。尽管对SARS和禽流感病例的分析使人们对这种方法提出了批评,但证券化理论被证明有助于概述中国对流行病的反应的不同阶段,包括反应性动员和随后的恢复往常努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号